Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505946›Full record

Observational studyClinical rehabilitation2024

Wellbeing After Stroke (WAterS): Feasibility Testing of a Co-developed Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Intervention to Support Psychological Adjustment After Stroke.

Emma Patchwood, Hannah Foote, Andy Vail, Sarah Cotterill, Geoff Hill, WAterS PCPI Group, Audrey Bowen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04655937 (Wellbeing After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04655937 phase1completednot on this map

Wellbeing After Stroke (WAterS) Pilot Study Exploring Upskilling a Workforce to Deliver Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Improving Psychological Adjustment and Wellbeing for Groups of Community-based Stroke Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManchesterRan2021 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsStroke, Psychological Distress, Cognitive Dysfunction, Communication DisordersArmsAcceptance and Commitment Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Link between post-stroke psychopathology and scope-of-action awareness.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma PatchwoodGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, The Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4198-5761
Hannah FooteGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, The Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1929-4139
Andy VailDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sarah CotterillDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Geoff HillNeuropsychology Service, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
WAterS PCPI Group
Audrey BowenGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, The Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4075-1215

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFeasibility test a co-developed intervention based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to support psychological adjustment post-stroke, delivered by a workforce with community in-reach.

designObservational feasibility study utilising patient, carer, public involvement.

settingOnline. UK.

participantsStroke survivors with self-reported psychological distress 4  +  months post-stroke.

interventionsThe co-developed Wellbeing After Stroke (WAterS) intervention includes: 9-weekly, structured, online, group sessions for stroke survivors, delivered via a training programme to upskill staff without Acceptance and Commitment Therapy experience, under Clinical Psychology supervision. MAIN MEASURES: Feasibility of recruitment and retention; data quality from candidate measures; safety. Clinical and demographic information at baseline; patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) via online surveys (baseline, pre- and post-intervention, 3 and 6 months after intervention end) including Mood (hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)), Wellbeing (ONS4), Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ5D5L), Psychological Flexibility (AAQ-ABI) and Values-Based Living (VQ).

resultsWe trained eight staff and recruited 17 stroke survivors with mild-to-moderate cognitive and communication difficulties. 12/17 (71%) joined three intervention groups with 98% attendance and no related adverse events. PROMS data were well-completed. The HADS is a possible future primary outcome (self-reported depression lower on average by 1.3 points: 8.5 pre-group to 7.1 at 3-month follow-up; 95% CI 0.4 to 3.2).

conclusionThe WAterS intervention warrants further research evaluation. Staff can be trained and upskilled to deliver. It appears safe and feasible to deliver online to groups, and study recruitment and data collection are feasible. Funding has been secured to further develop the intervention, considering implementation and health equality.

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyFeasibility StudiesStrokeStroke RehabilitationAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedEmotional AdjustmentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeUnited Kingdomacceptance and commitment therapyfeasibilitypsychological adjustmentrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID38505946
PMCPMC11118776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.