ReviewBiophysics reviews2023
Deep learning in spatial transcriptomics: Learning from the next next-generation sequencing.
Review in Biophysics reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics data analysis: advances and challenges from a data science perspective.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in spatial transcriptomics: a review of methods, datasets, and directions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- The Use of Deep Learning in RNA Therapeutic Development.ACS nano · 2026Review
- stRGAT: identifying spatial domains in spatial transcriptomics via a relational graph attention network.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- ZipAEr: A compressive convolutional autoencoder for high-dimensional spatial omics data at subcellular resolution.Research square · 2025Article
- Spatial transcriptomics meets diabetic kidney disease: Illuminating the path to precision medicine.World journal of diabetes · 2025Review
- Flexible analysis of spatial transcriptomics data (FAST): a deconvolution approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Computational Strategies and Algorithms for Inferring Cellular Composition of Spatial Transcriptomics Data.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2024Review
- ST-SCSR: identifying spatial domains in spatial transcriptomics data via structure correlation and self-representation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Deep learning in spatially resolved transcriptfomics: a comprehensive technical viewBriefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Spatial transcriptomic analysis of the mouse brain following chronic social defeat stress.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2023Article
- The Development of Plant Genome Sequencing Technology and Its Conservation and Application in Endangered Gymnosperms.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Boosting Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analysis with Simple Neural Attention.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Microsystem Advances through Integration with Artificial Intelligence.Micromachines · 2023Review
- A review on deep learning applications in highly multiplexed tissue imaging data analysis.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Review
- A guidebook of spatial transcriptomic technologies, data resources and analysis approaches.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Deep Learning in Diverse Intelligent Sensor Based Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics (ST) technologies are rapidly becoming the extension of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq), holding the potential of profiling gene expression at a single-cell resolution while maintaining cellular compositions within a tissue. Having both expression profiles and tissue organization enables researchers to better understand cellular interactions and heterogeneity, providing insight into complex biological processes that would not be possible with traditional sequencing technologies. Data generated by ST technologies are inherently noisy, high-dimensional, sparse, and multi-modal (including histological images, count matrices, etc.), thus requiring specialized computational tools for accurate and robust analysis. However, many ST studies currently utilize traditional scRNAseq tools, which are inadequate for analyzing complex ST datasets. On the other hand, many of the existing ST-specific methods are built upon traditional statistical or machine learning frameworks, which have shown to be sub-optimal in many applications due to the scale, multi-modality, and limitations of spatially resolved data (such as spatial resolution, sensitivity, and gene coverage). Given these intricacies, researchers have developed deep learning (DL)-based models to alleviate ST-specific challenges. These methods include new state-of-the-art models in alignment, spatial reconstruction, and spatial clustering, among others. However, DL models for ST analysis are nascent and remain largely underexplored. In this review, we provide an overview of existing state-of-the-art tools for analyzing spatially resolved transcriptomics while delving deeper into the DL-based approaches. We discuss the new frontiers and the open questions in this field and highlight domains in which we anticipate transformational DL applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.