Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505773›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

DCENet-based low-light image enhancement improved by spiking encoding and convLSTM.

Xinghao Wang, Qiang Wang, Lei Zhang, Yi Qu, Fan Yi, Jiayang Yu, Qiuhan Liu, Ruicong Xia, Ziling Xu, Sirong Tong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xinghao WangEquipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, China.
Qiang WangEquipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, China.
Lei ZhangEquipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, China.
Yi QuEquipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, China.
Fan YiEquipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, China.
Jiayang YuEquipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, China.
Qiuhan LiuEquipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, China.
Ruicong XiaEquipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, China.
Ziling XuEquipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, China.
Sirong TongEquipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The direct utilization of low-light images hinders downstream visual tasks. Traditional low-light image enhancement (LLIE) methods, such as Retinex-based networks, require image pairs. A spiking-coding methodology called intensity-to-latency has been used to gradually acquire the structural characteristics of an image. convLSTM has been used to connect the features. This study introduces a simplified DCENet to achieve unsupervised LLIE as well as the spiking coding mode of a spiking neural network. It also applies the comprehensive coding features of convLSTM to improve the subjective and objective effects of LLIE. In the ablation experiment for the proposed structure, the convLSTM structure was replaced by a convolutional neural network, and the classical CBAM attention was introduced for comparison. Five objective evaluation metrics were compared with nine LLIE methods that currently exhibit strong comprehensive performance, with PSNR, SSIM, MSE, UQI, and VIFP exceeding the second place at 4.4% (0.8%), 3.9% (17.2%), 0% (15%), 0.1% (0.2%), and 4.3% (0.9%) on the LOL and SCIE datasets. Further experiments of the user study in five non-reference datasets were conducted to subjectively evaluate the effects depicted in the images. These experiments verified the remarkable performance of the proposed method.

Indexed as

deep learningintensity-to-latencylow-light enhancementspiking encodingunpaired image

Identifiers

PMID38505773
PMCPMC10948416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.