Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505485›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2024

Explainable machine learning using echocardiography to improve risk prediction in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.

Mitchel A Molenaar, Berto J Bouma, Folkert W Asselbergs, Niels J Verouden, Jasper L Selder, Steven A J Chamuleau, Mark J Schuuring

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mitchel A MolenaarDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Berto J BoumaDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1433-9692
Folkert W AsselbergsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niels J VeroudenDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jasper L SelderDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Steven A J ChamuleauDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark J SchuuringDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2843-1852
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLHealth Data Research UK · GBUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend risk stratification with limited clinical parameters such as left ventricular (LV) function in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Machine learning (ML) methods enable an analysis of complex datasets including transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) studies. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ML using clinical and TTE data to predict all-cause 5-year mortality in patients with CCS and to compare its performance with traditional risk stratification scores. Methods and results: Data of consecutive patients with CCS were retrospectively collected if they attended the outpatient clinic of Amsterdam UMC location AMC between 2015 and 2017 and had a TTE assessment of the LV function. An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was trained to predict all-cause 5-year mortality. The performance of this ML model was evaluated using data from the Amsterdam UMC location VUmc and compared with the reference standard of traditional risk scores. A total of 1253 patients (775 training set and 478 testing set) were included, of which 176 patients (105 training set and 71 testing set) died during the 5-year follow-up period. The ML model demonstrated a superior performance [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.79] compared with traditional risk stratification tools (AUC 0.62-0.76) and showed good external performance. The most important TTE risk predictors included in the ML model were LV dysfunction and significant tricuspid regurgitation. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that an explainable ML model using TTE and clinical data can accurately identify high-risk CCS patients, with a prognostic value superior to traditional risk scores.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCoronary artery diseaseMachine learningMortalityPrognosisRisk

Identifiers

PMID38505485
PMCPMC10944683
OpenAlexW4391090993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.