Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505408›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2024

Clinical outcomes in patients with neurological disorders following periacetabular tumor removal and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the hemipelvis.

Jichuan Wang, Zhiqing Zhao, Haijie Liang, Jianfang Niu, Xingyu Liu, Han Wang, Yi Yang, Taiqiang Yan, Wei Guo, Xiaodong Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jichuan Wang *The Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Zhiqing Zhao *The Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Haijie Liang *The Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Jianfang NiuThe Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Xingyu LiuThe Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Han WangThe Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Yi YangThe Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Taiqiang YanThe Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Wei GuoThe Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Xiaodong TangThe Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNPeking University People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgical treatment of musculoskeletal tumors in the periacetabular region present extremely difficult due to the complex anatomy and need for reconstruction. Orthopedic surgeons face more difficulties in patients with neurological conditions, which can cause increased muscle tone, an elevated risk of fractures, and compromised bone quality. There is limited evidence regarding endoprosthetic reconstruction for periacetabular tumors in individuals with neurological disorders. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study to examine the outcomes of patients with preexisting neurological conditions who underwent surgery to remove periacetabular tumors and who underwent endoprosthesis reconstruction. Clinical presentation, detailed neurological conditions, complications, and functional outcomes were studied. Results: Sixteen out of the 838 patients were identified (1.91%), with a mean follow-up time of 33 months. The primary neurological conditions encompassed Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and cerebral ischemic stroke. Every patient was diagnosed with periacetabular lesions that were either primary or oligometastatic. They underwent tumor resection and subsequently received endoprosthetic reconstruction of the hemipelvis. Three patients developed metastasis lesions later, and two patients experienced tumor recurrence. Five cases experienced hip dislocation-one with periprosthetic fracture and one with surgical site infection. The position of the prosthetic rotating center was not correlated with dislocation. The reoperation rate was 31.25%. The cohort of patients all presented with more extended hospital stays and rehabilitation. In 3 patients, the general functional score was good, while in 6 patients, it was fair; in 7 patients, it was regarded as poor. The average MSTS93 score was 49.71%. Conclusion: Endoprosthetic reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection is an effective way to eliminate tumors and salvage limbs. However, this group of patients has an increased likelihood of secondary surgery, complications, extended hospital stay, and no significant improvement in functional outcomes. Despite the diverse nature of the cohort, it is recommended to consider enhanced soft tissue reconstruction, supervised functional recovery and rehabilitation training.

Indexed as

clinical outcomeshemipelvis reconstructionneurological conditionsParkinson’s diseaseperiacetabular musculoskeletal tumors

Identifiers

PMID38505408
PMCPMC10948498
OpenAlexW4392466813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.