Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505395›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2024

Defining a low-risk birth cohort: a cohort study comparing two perinatal data sets in Ontario, Canada.

Elizabeth Kathleen Darling, Olivia Marquez, Alison L Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. BORN to be validated: Assessing agreement between Ontario's birth registry and CIHI-DAD.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth Kathleen DarlingMcMaster Midwifery Research Centre, 1280 Main Street West, HSC 4H24, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1 Canada.
Olivia MarquezMcMaster Midwifery Research Centre, 1280 Main Street West, HSC 4H24, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1 Canada.
Alison L ParkICES University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 424, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada.
McMaster University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There are two main data sources for perinatal data in Ontario, Canada: the BORN BIS and CIHI-DAD. Such databases are used for perinatal health surveillance and research, and to guide health care related decisions. Objectives: Our primary objective was to examine the level of agreement between the BIS and CIHI-DAD. Our secondary objectives were to identify the differences between the data sources when identifying a low-risk birth (LRB) cohort and to understand their implications. Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study comparing characteristics and clinical outcomes of all linkable births in BIS and CIHI-DAD between 1 Results: During the study period, 779,979 eligible births were linkable between the two data sources. After applying the LRB exclusions, there were 129,908 cases in the BIS and 136,184 cases in CIHI-DAD. Most exclusion criteria had almost perfect, substantial or moderate agreement. The agreement for non-cephalic presentation and BMI ≥ 40 kg/m Conclusions: Overall, we found high levels of agreement between the BIS and CIHI-DAD. Identifying a LRB cohort in either database may be appropriate, with the caveat of appropriate understanding of the collection, coding and definition of certain outcomes. The decision for selecting a database may depend on which variables are most important in a particular analysis.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHospitalizationBirth CohortCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantOntarioPregnancyadministrative databirth registrycohort studydata accuracydatabaselinkagelow-risk birthperinatalpopulation data

Identifiers

PMID38505395
PMCPMC10949111
OpenAlexW4392911424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.