Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505360›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

The contribution of Sensory Processing Sensitivity and internalized attachment representations on emotion regulation competencies in school-age children.

Alessandra Sperati, Bianca P Acevedo, Antonio Dellagiulia, Mirco Fasolo, Maria Spinelli, Giulio D'Urso, Francesca Lionetti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandra SperatiDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging, and Clinical Sciences, University of G. d'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Bianca P AcevedoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States.
Antonio DellagiuliaDepartment of Psychology, Salesian University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Mirco FasoloDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging, and Clinical Sciences, University of G. d'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Maria SpinelliDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging, and Clinical Sciences, University of G. d'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Giulio D'UrsoDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging, and Clinical Sciences, University of G. d'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Francesca LionettiDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging, and Clinical Sciences, University of G. d'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
University of Chieti-Pescara · ITSalesian Pontifical University · ITUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As captured by the individual trait of Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS), highly sensitive children perceive, process, and responds more strongly to stimuli. This increased sensitivity may make more demanding the process of regulating and managing emotions. Yet, developmental psychology literature also showed that other variables, as those related to the rearing environment, are likely to contribute to the process of regulating emotions. With the current contribution, we aim to bridge two lines of research, that of attachment studies and that of SPS, by investigating the additive and interactive contribution of SPS and internal working models of attachment representations on emotion regulation competencies in school-aged children. Method: Participants were Results: SPS was not directly associated with emotion regulation but it was significantly associated with positive attachment representations in predicting emotion regulation. Highly sensitive children showed poorer emotion regulation when the internalized representations were low in maternal warmth and responsiveness. When driven by sensitive and empathic attachment representation, highly sensitive children showed better emotion regulation than less-sensitive peers, suggesting a for better and for worse effect. Discussion: Highly sensitive children are not only more vulnerable to adversities but also show better emotion regulation competencies when supported by positive internal working models of attachment relationships. Overall, findings shed light on the link between SPS and attachment and suggest that working for promoting secure attachment relationships in parent-child dyads may promote better emotion regulation competences, particularly in highly sensitive children.

Indexed as

attachmentemotion regulationinternalized attachment relationshipsinternal working modelsobservational studyschool-age childrenSensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS)

Identifiers

PMID38505360
PMCPMC10949720
OpenAlexW4392472193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.