Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505315›Full record

Observational studyCanadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD2024

The use of panoramic radiographs to address the oral health needs of vulnerable Canadian populations.

Fabiana T Almeida, Silvia Gianoni-Capenakas, Heidi Rabie, Rafael Figueiredo, Camila Pacheco-Pereira

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabiana T AlmeidaSchool of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Silvia Gianoni-CapenakasSchool of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Heidi RabieProvincial Oral Health Office, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Rafael FigueiredoSchool of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Camila Pacheco-PereiraSchool of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The high demand for oral health care services among vulnerable individuals combined with limited available resources requires a rethinking of the provision of oral health services. This study aimed to determine the usefulness of the dental panoramic radiograph (DPR) as an imaging tool to assess oral health and prioritize dental interventions in vulnerable patients. Methods: This observational and retrospective study evaluated charts of patients who attended Public Health Dental Clinics (PHDC), Alberta Health Services (AHS), in Calgary, Canada, between January 2018 and December 2019. Data collected included sex and age at the time of image acquisition. The following radiographic findings were gathered: the number of missing, present, decayed, restored, and impacted teeth; periapical lesions; retained root; periodontal bone loss; odontogenic and non-odontogenic lesions in the jaws; carotid calcification; and incidental radiographic findings with clinical relevance. Results: Of the 526 DPRs evaluated, 57.4% were from male patients and 42.6% were from female patients, with a mean age of 38.5 years. The average number of present teeth in females and males was 23.7 and 22.6, respectively. The most prevalent dental-related finding was periodontal bone loss (81.5%), followed by periapical lesions (59.6%) and impacted teeth (27%). Among non-dental findings, osseous lesions of the jaws were found in 10.4% of the patients, and carotid atheroma had a frequency of 3.2%. Conclusion: The DPR is a useful adjunct to the clinical exam in this specific population. It provides an opportunistic overview of their oral health and necessary support to establish priorities in oral health care in a public health setting.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossTooth, ImpactedAdultAlbertaFemaleHumansMaleOral HealthRadiography, PanoramicRetrospective Studiesdental carehealth servicesoral healthpublic healthradiography, panoramic

Identifiers

PMID38505315
PMCPMC10946316
OpenAlexW4394750668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.