Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505275›Full record

ReviewBiophysics reviews2022

Leveraging ultra-low interfacial tension and liquid-liquid phase separation in embedded 3D bioprinting.

Senthilkumar Duraivel, Vignesh Subramaniam, Steven Chisolm, Georg M Scheutz, Brent S Sumerlin, Tapomoy Bhattacharjee, Thomas E Angelini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysics reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Senthilkumar DuraivelDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7296-682X
Vignesh SubramaniamDepartment of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4435-2433
Steven ChisolmDepartment of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.
Georg M ScheutzGeorge & Josephine Butler Polymer Research Laboratory, Center for Macromolecular Science & Engineering, Department of Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.
Brent S SumerlinGeorge & Josephine Butler Polymer Research Laboratory, Center for Macromolecular Science & Engineering, Department of Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.
Tapomoy BhattacharjeeNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bellary Road, Bangalore 560065, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8899-1379
Thomas E AngeliniDepartment of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0313-4341

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many recently developed 3D bioprinting strategies operate by extruding aqueous biopolymer solutions directly into a variety of different support materials constituted from swollen, solvated, aqueous, polymer assemblies. In developing these 3D printing methods and materials, great care is often taken to tune the rheological behaviors of both inks and 3D support media. By contrast, much less attention has been given to the physics of the interfaces created when structuring one polymer phase into another in embedded 3D printing applications. For example, it is currently unclear whether a dynamic interfacial tension between miscible phases stabilizes embedded 3D bioprinted structures as they are shaped while in a liquid state. Interest in the physics of interfaces between complex fluids has grown dramatically since the discovery of liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) in living cells. We believe that many new insights coming from this burst of investigation into LLPS within biological contexts can be leveraged to develop new materials and methods for improved 3D bioprinting that leverage LLPS in mixtures of biopolymers, biocompatible synthetic polymers, and proteins. Thus, in this review article, we highlight work at the interface between recent LLPS research and embedded 3D bioprinting methods and materials, and we introduce a 3D bioprinting method that leverages LLPS to stabilize printed biopolymer inks embedded in a bioprinting support material.

Identifiers

PMID38505275
PMCPMC10903370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.