Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505271›Full record

ArticleRemote sensing in ecology and conservation2023

StrucNet: a global network for automated vegetation structure monitoring.

Kim Calders, Benjamin Brede, Glenn Newnham, Darius Culvenor, John Armston, Harm Bartholomeus, Anne Griebel, Jodie Hayward, Samuli Junttila, Alvaro Lau and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Remote sensing in ecology and conservation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Kim CaldersCAVElab - Computational & Applied Vegetation Ecology, Department of Environment Ghent University Coupure links 653 Ghent 9000 Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4562-2538
Benjamin BredeHelmholtz Center Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Section 1.4 Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics Telegrafenberg Potsdam 14473 Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9253-4517
Glenn NewnhamCSIRO Research Way Clayton Victoria 3168 Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6913-1258
Darius CulvenorEnvironmental Sensing Systems Bentleigh East Victoria 3165 Australia.
John ArmstonDepartment of Geographical Sciences University of Maryland College Park Maryland USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1232-3424
Harm BartholomeusLaboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing Wageningen University Wageningen 6708 PB the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1905-7678
Anne GriebelHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University Locked Bag 1797 Penrith New South Wales 2751 Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4476-8279
Jodie HaywardCSIRO 564 Vanderlin Drive Berrimah Northern Territory 0828 Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4613-615X
Samuli JunttilaSchool of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland Joensuu 80101 Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8276-9259
Alvaro LauLaboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing Wageningen University Wageningen 6708 PB the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0419-7002
Shaun LevickCSIRO 564 Vanderlin Drive Berrimah Northern Territory 0828 Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4437-9174
Rosalinda MorroneClimate and Earth Observation Group National Physical Laboratory Hampton Road, Teddington London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1202-791X
Niall OrigoClimate and Earth Observation Group National Physical Laboratory Hampton Road, Teddington London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8475-6264
Marion PfeiferSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-3141
Jan VerbesseltLaboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing Wageningen University Wageningen 6708 PB the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7923-4309
Martin HeroldHelmholtz Center Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Section 1.4 Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics Telegrafenberg Potsdam 14473 Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0246-6886
Wageningen University & Research · NLCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUGFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences · DENational Physical Laboratory · GBUniversity of Eastern Finland · FICSIRO Manufacturing · AUNewcastle University · GBSouth East Water (Australia) · AUUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change and increasing human activities are impacting ecosystems and their biodiversity. Quantitative measurements of essential biodiversity variables (EBV) and essential climate variables are used to monitor biodiversity and carbon dynamics and evaluate policy and management interventions. Ecosystem structure is at the core of EBVs and carbon stock estimation and can help to inform assessments of species and species diversity. Ecosystem structure is also used as an indirect indicator of habitat quality and expected species richness or species community composition. Spaceborne measurements can provide large-scale insight into monitoring the structural dynamics of ecosystems, but they generally lack consistent, robust, timely and detailed information regarding their full three-dimensional vegetation structure at local scales. Here we demonstrate the potential of high-frequency ground-based laser scanning to systematically monitor structural changes in vegetation. We present a proof-of-concept high-temporal ecosystem structure time series of 5 years in a temperate forest using terrestrial laser scanning (TLS). We also present data from automated high-temporal laser scanning that can allow upscaling of vegetation structure scanning, overcoming the limitations of a typically opportunistic TLS measurement approach. Automated monitoring will be a critical component to build a network of field monitoring sites that can provide the required calibration data for satellite missions to effectively monitor the structural dynamics of vegetation over large areas. Within this perspective, we reflect on how this network could be designed and discuss implementation pathways.

Indexed as

Automationecosystem structureessential biodiversity variableslidarmonitoringvegetation structure monitoring

Identifiers

PMID38505271
PMCPMC10946942
OpenAlexW4365512604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.