Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505231›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2024

Timing and location of speech errors induced by direct cortical stimulation.

Heather Kabakoff, Leyao Yu, Daniel Friedman, Patricia Dugan, Werner K Doyle, Orrin Devinsky, Adeen Flinker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heather KabakoffDepartment of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-5850
Leyao YuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New York University School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA.
Daniel FriedmanDepartment of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1068-1797
Patricia DuganDepartment of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Werner K DoyleDepartment of Neurosurgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Orrin DevinskyDepartment of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0044-4632
Adeen FlinkerDepartment of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1247-1283
New York University · US

Funding

Diagnostic validity and safety of high-gamma language mapping with intracranial EEGR01NS115929 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Ravindra Arya, NATHAN E CRONE · 2020 to 2026
$3.9M
Characterizing the temporal processing of speech in the human auditory cortexR01DC018805 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FLINKER, ADEEN, MESGARANI, NIMA · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Spatiotemporal Organization of the Inferior Frontal Gyrus During Speech Production - Resubmission - 1R01NS109367 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FLINKER, ADEEN · 2019 to 2023
$2.8M
Cortical and subcortical underpinnings of typical and dysarthric speech - Resubmission - 1F32DC021094 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI KABAKOFF, HEATHER M · 2023 to 2025
$226k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC021094NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018805NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109367NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS115929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical regions supporting speech production are commonly established using neuroimaging techniques in both research and clinical settings. However, for neurosurgical purposes, structural function is routinely mapped peri-operatively using direct electrocortical stimulation. While this method is the gold standard for identification of eloquent cortical regions to preserve in neurosurgical patients, there is lack of specificity of the actual underlying cognitive processes being interrupted. To address this, we propose mapping the temporal dynamics of speech arrest across peri-sylvian cortices by quantifying the latency between stimulation and speech deficits. In doing so, we are able to substantiate hypotheses about distinct region-specific functional roles (e.g. planning versus motor execution). In this retrospective observational study, we analysed 20 patients (12 female; age range 14-43) with refractory epilepsy who underwent continuous extra-operative intracranial EEG monitoring of an automatic speech task during clinical bedside language mapping. Latency to speech arrest was calculated as time from stimulation onset to speech arrest onset, controlling for individual speech rate. Most instances of motor-based arrest (87.5% of 96 instances) were in sensorimotor cortex with mid-range latencies to speech arrest with a distributional peak at 0.47 s. Speech arrest occurred in numerous regions, with relatively short latencies in supramarginal gyrus (0.46 s), superior temporal gyrus (0.51 s) and middle temporal gyrus (0.54 s), followed by relatively long latencies in sensorimotor cortex (0.72 s) and especially long latencies in inferior frontal gyrus (0.95 s). Non-parametric testing for speech arrest revealed that region predicted latency; latencies in supramarginal gyrus and in superior temporal gyrus were shorter than in sensorimotor cortex and in inferior frontal gyrus. Sensorimotor cortex is primarily responsible for motor-based arrest. Latencies to speech arrest in supramarginal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus (and to a lesser extent middle temporal gyrus) align with latencies to motor-based arrest in sensorimotor cortex. This pattern of relatively quick cessation of speech suggests that stimulating these regions interferes with the outgoing motor execution. In contrast, the latencies to speech arrest in inferior frontal gyrus and in ventral regions of sensorimotor cortex were significantly longer than those in temporoparietal regions. Longer latencies in the more frontal areas (including inferior frontal gyrus and ventral areas of precentral gyrus and postcentral gyrus) suggest that stimulating these areas interrupts a higher-level speech production process involved in planning. These results implicate the ventral specialization of sensorimotor cortex (including both precentral and postcentral gyri) for speech planning above and beyond motor execution.

Indexed as

electrocorticographyspeech motor controlspeech productionsubdural electrodes

Identifiers

PMID38505231
PMCPMC10948744
OpenAlexW4393120679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.