Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505230›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2024

Comparison of cerebrospinal fluid, plasma and neuroimaging biomarker utility in Alzheimer's disease.

Karin L Meeker, Patrick H Luckett, Nicolas R Barthélemy, Diana A Hobbs, Charles Chen, James Bollinger, Vitaliy Ovod, Shaney Flores, Sarah Keefe, Rachel L Henson and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Predicting continuous amyloid PET values with CSF tau phosphorylation occupancies.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karin L MeekerDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2677-5715
Patrick H LuckettDepartment of Neurosurgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2262-6605
Nicolas R BarthélemyDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Diana A HobbsDepartment of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Charles ChenDepartment of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6698-1268
James BollingerDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Vitaliy OvodDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Shaney FloresDepartment of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Sarah KeefeDepartment of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Rachel L HensonDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Elizabeth M HerriesDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Eric McDadeDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Jason J HassenstabDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Chengjie XiongKnight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Carlos CruchagaKnight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Tammie L S BenzingerDepartment of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
David M HoltzmanDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Suzanne E SchindlerDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Randall J BatemanDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7729-1702
John C MorrisDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Brian A GordonDepartment of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2109-2955
Beau M AncesDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN MORRIS · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
Imaging CoreU19AG032438 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BATEMAN, RANDALL J · 2010 to 2025
$53.9M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH CENTERP50AG005681 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 1985 to 2019
$52.1M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Staging Alzheimer disease with blood-based biomarkersR01AG070941 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHINDLER, SUZANNE ELIZABETH · 2021 to 2025
$4.3M
PET Imaging of Neuroinflammation in Genetic Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG052550 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Beau M Ances, Tammie Lee Smith Benzinger · 2018 to 2026
$4.2M
FALLS: A MARKER OF PRECLINICAL ALZHEIMERS DISEASER01AG057680 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ANCES, BEAU M, STARK, SUSAN LYNN · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
Frailty and Brain Integrity in Older HIV-infected IndividualsR01NR014449 · NINR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ANCES, BEAU M · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
Multidisciplinary Training in Alzheimer and Related DementiasT32AG058518 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Eric Martin McDade, Barbara Joy Snider · 2018 to 2026
$2.3M
Plasma Abeta isoform concentrations in cognitively impaired patients at risk for amyloidosisR44AG059489 · NIA · C2N DIAGNOSTICS, LLC · PI WEST, TIM · 2018 to 2020
$2.0M
NEUROIMAGING AND NEUROBEHAVIORAL BASIS OF RISKY DECISION-MAKING IN ADOLESCENTSR01NR012907 · NINR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ANCES, BEAU M · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AG000391NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NIA NIH HHS K01 AG053474NIA NIH HHS K01 AG083115NIA NIH HHS K23 AG053426NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005681NIA NIH HHS R01 AG052550NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057680NIA NIH HHS R01 AG070941NIA NIH HHS R03 AG050921NIA NIH HHS R44 AG059489NIA NIH HHS T32 AG058518NIA NIH HHS U19 AG032438NINR NIH HHS R01 NR012657NINR NIH HHS R01 NR012907NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease biomarkers are crucial to understanding disease pathophysiology, aiding accurate diagnosis and identifying target treatments. Although the number of biomarkers continues to grow, the relative utility and uniqueness of each is poorly understood as prior work has typically calculated serial pairwise relationships on only a handful of markers at a time. The present study assessed the cross-sectional relationships among 27 Alzheimer's disease biomarkers simultaneously and determined their ability to predict meaningful clinical outcomes using machine learning. Data were obtained from 527 community-dwelling volunteers enrolled in studies at the Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center at Washington University in St Louis. We used hierarchical clustering to group 27 imaging, CSF and plasma measures of amyloid beta, tau [phosphorylated tau (p-tau), total tau t-tau)], neuronal injury and inflammation drawn from MRI, PET, mass-spectrometry assays and immunoassays. Neuropsychological and genetic measures were also included. Random forest-based feature selection identified the strongest predictors of amyloid PET positivity across the entire cohort. Models also predicted cognitive impairment across the entire cohort and in amyloid PET-positive individuals. Four clusters emerged reflecting: core Alzheimer's disease pathology (amyloid and tau), neurodegeneration, AT8 antibody-associated phosphorylated tau sites and neuronal dysfunction. In the entire cohort, CSF p-tau181/A

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasebiomarkersmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38505230
PMCPMC10950051
OpenAlexW4392886218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.