Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505228›Full record

ReviewBiophysics reviews2022

Cataloguing the proteome: Current developments in single-molecule protein sequencing.

Morgan M Brady, Anne S Meyer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysics reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Proteoforms as the true units of physiological function.European journal of applied physiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Ten "Cheat Codes" for Measuring Oxidative Stress in Humans.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Morgan M BradyDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1650-6167
Anne S MeyerDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4164-0122

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cellular proteome is complex and dynamic, with proteins playing a critical role in cell-level biological processes that contribute to homeostasis, stimuli response, and disease pathology, among others. As such, protein analysis and characterization are of extreme importance in both research and clinical settings. In the last few decades, most proteomics analysis has relied on mass spectrometry, affinity reagents, or some combination thereof. However, these techniques are limited by their requirements for large sample amounts, low resolution, and insufficient dynamic range, making them largely insufficient for the characterization of proteins in low-abundance or single-cell proteomic analysis. Despite unique technical challenges, several single-molecule protein sequencing (SMPS) technologies have been proposed in recent years to address these issues. In this review, we outline several approaches to SMPS technologies and discuss their advantages, limitations, and potential contributions toward an accurate, sensitive, and high-throughput platform.

Identifiers

PMID38505228
PMCPMC10903494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.