Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505172›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2024

Oriented Graphene Oxide Scaffold Promotes Nerve Regeneration in vitro and in vivo.

Xu Zhou, Aolin Tang, Chengjie Xiong, Guoquan Zhang, Liangliang Huang, Feng Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Effect of composite graphene-protein hydrogels on neural regeneration after spinal cord injury in rats].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xu Zhou *The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-8022-4515
Aolin Tang *Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Chengjie Xiong *Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3318-1875
Guoquan ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0007-2975-9546
Liangliang HuangThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.
Feng XuThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treating peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) with defects remains challenging in clinical practice. The commercial conduits have shown suboptimal nerve regeneration and functional recovery due to their basic tubular design without electroactive and oriented topographical cues. Purpose: To develop a new scaffold with oriented microstructure and electroactive Graphene oxide (GO) and investigate its' therapeutic effect on nerve regeneration in vitro and in vivo. Methods: This study employed a straightforward approach to co-spin PCL and GO, yielding an oriented hybrid nanofibrous scaffold known as the O-GO/PCL scaffold. The physical and chemical properties of nanofibrous scaffold were tested by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), tensile test and so on. Primary Schwann cells (SCs) and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were used to investigate the impact of the newly developed scaffolds on the biological behavior of neural cells in vitro. Transcriptome sequencing (mRNA-seq) was employed to probe the underlying mechanisms of the synergistic effect of electroactive GO and longitudinal topographic guidance on nerve regeneration. Furthermore, the developed O-GO/PCL scaffold was utilized to bridge a 10-mm sciatic nerve defect in rat, aiming to investigate its therapeutic potential for peripheral nerve regeneration in vivo. Results and discussion: The SEM and TEM revealed that the newly developed O-GO/PCL scaffold showed longitudinally oriented microstructure and GO particles were homogenously and uniformly distributed inside the nanofibers. Primary SCs were utilized to assess the biocompatibility of the GO-based scaffold, revealing that negligible cytotoxicity when GO concentration does not exceed 0.5%. In vitro analysis of nerve regeneration demonstrated that axons in the O-GO/PCL group exhibited an average length of 1054.88 ± 161.32 µm, significant longer than those in the other groups ( Conclusion: The O-GO/PCL scaffold with oriented microstructure and electroactive GO represents a promising heral nerve reconstruction.

Indexed as

GraphiteNanofibersTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsNerve RegenerationPolyestersRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRNA, MessengerSciatic Nervegraphene oxideGraphitePolyestersRNA, Messengerelectroactivegraphene oxidenanofibersnerve regenerationtopographical guidance

Identifiers

PMID38505172
PMCPMC10949378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.