Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505117›Full record

ReviewReviews in aquaculture2023

Planning and licensing for marine aquaculture.

Lynne Falconer, Karl Cutajar, Amalia Krupandan, Elisa Capuzzo, Richard A Corner, Tim Ellis, Keith Jeffery, Eirik Mikkelsen, Heather Moore, Francis X O'Beirn and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in aquaculture, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lynne FalconerInstitute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling Stirling Scotland UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1899-1290
Karl CutajarInstitute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling Stirling Scotland UK.
Amalia KrupandanInstitute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling Stirling Scotland UK.
Elisa CapuzzoCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science Dorset UK.
Richard A CornerSchool of Ocean Science, Bangor University Wales UK.
Tim EllisCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science Dorset UK.
Keith JefferyCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science Dorset UK.
Eirik MikkelsenNofima Tromsø Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9963-8837
Heather MooreAgri-Food and Biosciences Institute Belfast UK.
Francis X O'BeirnMarine Institute, Oranmore, Co. Galway Ireland.
Pauline O'DonohoeMarine Institute, Oranmore, Co. Galway Ireland.
Neil M RuaneMarine Institute, Oranmore, Co. Galway Ireland.
Robyn ShillandThe Association for Coastal Ecosystem Services Lochend Cottage Dunbar UK.
Paul TettScottish Association for Marine Science Oban UK.
Trevor C TelferInstitute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling Stirling Scotland UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine aquaculture has the potential to increase its contribution to the global food system and provide valuable ecosystem services, but appropriate planning, licensing and regulation systems must be in place to enable sustainable development. At present, approaches vary considerably throughout the world, and several national and regional investigations have highlighted the need for reforms if marine aquaculture is to fulfil its potential. This article aims to map and evaluate the challenges of planning and licensing for growth of sustainable marine aquaculture. Despite the range of species, production systems and circumstances, this study found a number of common themes in the literature; complicated and fragmented approaches to planning and licensing, property rights and the licence to operate, competition for space and marine spatial planning, emerging species and diversifying marine aquaculture production (seaweed production, Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture [IMTA], nutrient and carbon offsetting with aquaculture, offshore aquaculture and co-location and multiuse platforms), and the need to address knowledge gaps and use of decision-support tools. Planning and licensing can be highly complicated, so the UK is used as a case study to show more detailed examples that highlight the range of challenges and uncertainty that industry, regulators and policymakers face across interacting jurisdictions. There are many complexities, but this study shows that many countries have undergone, or are undergoing, similar challenges, suggesting that lessons can be learned by sharing knowledge and experiences, even across different species and production systems, rather than having a more insular focus.

Indexed as

aquaculture planningenvironmental managementlicensingregulationsustainable development

Identifiers

PMID38505117
PMCPMC10947445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.