Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505100›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2024

A toolbox for decoding BCI commands based on event-related potentials.

Christoph Reichert, Catherine M Sweeney-Reed, Hermann Hinrichs, Stefan Dürschmid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christoph ReichertDepartment of Behavioral Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Catherine M Sweeney-ReedNeurocybernetics and Rehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Hermann HinrichsDepartment of Behavioral Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Stefan DürschmidDepartment of Behavioral Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commands in brain-computer interface (BCI) applications often rely on the decoding of event-related potentials (ERP). For instance, the P300 potential is frequently used as a marker of attention to an oddball event. Error-related potentials and the N2pc signal are further examples of ERPs used for BCI control. One challenge in decoding brain activity from the electroencephalogram (EEG) is the selection of the most suitable channels and appropriate features for a particular classification approach. Here we introduce a toolbox that enables ERP-based decoding using the full set of channels, while automatically extracting informative components from relevant channels. The strength of our approach is that it handles sequences of stimuli that encode multiple items using binary classification, such as target vs. nontarget events typically used in ERP-based spellers. We demonstrate examples of application scenarios and evaluate the performance of four openly available datasets: a P300-based matrix speller, a P300-based rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) speller, a binary BCI based on the N2pc, and a dataset capturing error potentials. We show that our approach achieves performances comparable to those in the original papers, with the advantage that only conventional preprocessing is required by the user, while channel weighting and decoding algorithms are internally performed. Thus, we provide a tool to reliably decode ERPs for BCI use with minimal programming requirements.

Indexed as

BCIcanonical correlation analysisERPN2pcP300speller

Identifiers

PMID38505100
PMCPMC10949531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.