ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Identification of prognostic biomarkers of smoking-related lung cancer.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A macrophage MHC-I axis links intratumoral heterogeneity to terminal CD8NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Secretory leukocyte peptidase inhibitor as a dynamic radiotherapy response biomarker in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.MedScience · 2026Article
- Article
- The prognostic significance and Immunomodulatory role of SCGB3A1 expression in stage I lung adenocarcinoma.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
- Exposure-lag response of surface net solar radiation on lung cancer incidence: a global time-series analysis.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Landscape of targeted therapies for lung squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The early diagnosis and effective prognostic treatment measures for lung cancer are still limited, leading to a 5-year survival rate of less than 15% for these patients. Smoking is one of the causes of lung cancer, but it is not the initial carcinogenic factor. It is not clear what specific mechanism cigarette induces lung cancer, and there is a lack of research on the relationship between related genes and the prognosis of patients with smoking lung cancer. The objective of this study was to provide new theoretical evidence and potential therapeutic targets for the mechanisms of smoking-related lung cancer formation. Methods: The gene expression profile data from the GSE12428 dataset which includes 63 lung cancer and normal tissue pairs were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and data from smokers with lung cancer [both lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC)] from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were analyzed. The differential genes in smokers with lung cancer were screened using the linear model for microarray data via R software. The differential gene enrichment analysis was performed using the online analysis software Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID). The expression levels of differential genes and their correlation with patient tumor clinical stage were analyzed using gene expression profiling interactive analysis (GEPIA). The overall survival rate was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: In the GSE12428 dataset, 225 upregulated genes and 565 downregulated genes were identified in cancer tissues; based on smoking status, 1 upregulated gene and 4 downregulated genes were identified. Among smokers who also had lung cancer, 4 genes were downregulated, namely Conclusions: Three genes
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.