ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Dietary habits and nutrition status in esophageal cancer patients after esophageal reconstruction.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of reflux symptoms after esophagectomy: patient-reported outcomes and management.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- The effects of a 3-month walking and dietary education program on the quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer: a 1-year follow-up randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Trial
- Clinical predictors of early reflux and symptom severity after esophagectomy: a risk prediction tool.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2026Article
- Prediction of dumping after oesophageal cancer surgery.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
- Symptom clusters and core symptoms in early postoperative esophageal cancer patients.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of LEARNS Model-Based Health Education on Swallowing Safety and Psychological Well-Being in Postoperative Esophageal Cancer Patients.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- The distress of psychological adaptation in nutritional management among people after esophagectomy: an interpretative phenomenological study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an early warning model for postoperative reflux in patients with esophageal cancer.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Health-related quality of life and related factors among esophageal cancer survivors after esophagectomy in the 6-month postoperative period: A multicenter cross-sectional study in north China.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Jejunostomy feeding plus oral feeding versus intravenous nutrition plus oral feeding after esophageal cancer resection: a comparative retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgery is the cornerstone of the treatment of esophageal cancer (EC). This study is to evaluate the dietary habits and nutrition status in EC patients who underwent esophagectomy followed by esophageal reconstruction. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with EC who underwent esophagectomy followed by esophageal reconstruction in the Department of Thoracic Surgery I of Peking University Cancer Hospital between February 2014 and December 2018. The primary outcomes were dietary habits and nutrition status. The secondary outcomes were gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life (QoL). Results: A total of 346 patients were included. At 30 months after the operation, 90.2% of the patients had recovered to regular dietary habits, 72.8% of patients had a restored frequency of preoperative regular food intake, 2.3% of the patients ate more than six times a day, and 0.6% had semi-liquid food because of bad teeth. The nutrition status remained stable after 6 months postoperatively and recovered slightly 1 year after the surgery. At 30 months after the operation, the most common gastrointestinal symptoms were reflux (38.4%), dysphagia (15.3%), hoarseness (11.8%), abdominal distension (6.6%), diarrhea (2.9%), and nausea and vomiting (2.3%). According to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-OG 25 (EORTC QLQ-OG 25), the factors that affected the life quality of patients during follow-up were anxiety, reflux, and dietary limitations. Conclusions: Most patients with EC who underwent esophageal reconstruction recovered to regular dietary habits and stable nutrition status, while some may still suffer from gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety, and dietary limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.