Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505044›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024

A comparison of GOLD 2019 and 2023 recommendations to contemporaneous real-world inhaler treatment patterns for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management in Singapore.

Rayan Alsuwaigh, Anthony Yii, Chee Hong Loh, Xiaomeng Xu, Priti Bahety, Aldo A Navarro Rojas, Dominique Milea, Augustine Tee

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rayan AlsuwaighDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Anthony YiiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Chee Hong LohDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Xiaomeng XuValue Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Greater China and Intercontinental, Singapore, Singapore.
Priti BahetyMedical Affairs, GSK, Greater China and Intercontinental, Singapore, Singapore.
Aldo A Navarro RojasMedical Affairs, GSK, Greater China and Intercontinental, Singapore, Singapore.
Dominique MileaValue Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Greater China and Intercontinental, Singapore, Singapore.
Augustine TeeDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Changi General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In 2019 and 2023, the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) provided updated strategies for modifying the therapy of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and high exacerbation risk. A key update since the 2019 guidelines recommends considering blood eosinophil count to guide decisions on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment. To evaluate the potential impact of these updated recommendations, this study aimed to assess how extensively future practice would diverge from contemporaneous prescribing practices at a single center in Singapore, assuming adherence to the 2019 and 2023 GOLD guidelines. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of the Changi General Hospital COPD data warehouse involving patients aged ≥40 years hospitalized for a COPD exacerbation (October 2018-April 2020) receiving long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), LAMA plus a long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA), or an ICS plus LABA at admission. The proportion of patients eligible for treatment escalations per GOLD 2019 and 2023 recommendations was calculated. Results: In total, 268 patients were included (mean age 73 years; 91% male). At admission, 19%, 59%, and 22% of patients were receiving LAMA, LAMA + LABA, and ICS + LABA, respectively. Overall, 226 patients would have been eligible for treatment escalation per GOLD 2019 or 2023 recommendations; 31 (13.7%) had treatment escalations consistent with GOLD 2019 guidelines and 34 (15%) received treatment escalations consistent with GOLD 2023 guidelines. A total of 205 patients (76.5%) remained on the same treatment regimen at hospital discharge as they were receiving at admission. Lower measured post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second was associated with treatment escalations that would have been GOLD-concordant (P=0.028), as was increased number of emergency department/hospital visits in the last year (P=0.048). Conclusions: Compared with real-world clinical practice, a significantly higher proportion of patients may be eligible for treatment escalation under the GOLD 2019 and 2023 eosinophil-directed algorithms.

Indexed as

Bronchodilatorchronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)exacerbationGlobal Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)triple therapy

Identifiers

PMID38505044
PMCPMC10944796
OpenAlexW4392244636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.