Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505030›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024

Effect of prone positioning on survival in adult patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled study.

Hongjie Tong, Feiyan Pan, Xiaoling Zhang, Shengwei Jia, Rishik Vashisht, Kun Chen, Qianqian Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prone positioning in ARDS.Intensive care medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongjie Tong *Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China.
Feiyan Pan *Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China.
Xiaoling ZhangDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China.
Shengwei JiaDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China.
Rishik VashishtSentara Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Specialists, Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
Kun ChenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China.
Qianqian WangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing, China.
Zhejiang University · CNFirst Hospital of Jiaxing · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current data supporting the use of prone positioning (PP) during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are limited. This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to determine whether PP implemented within 24 hours of ECMO can improve survival in these patients. Methods: From June 2021 to July 2023, 97 adult patients receiving VV-ECMO for ARDS in three centers were enrolled and 1:1 randomized into PP (n=49) and control groups (n=48). Patients in the PP group receiving prone positioning, while the control group were maintained in the supine position. The primary outcome was 30-day survival, and secondary outcomes included in-hospital survival and other clinical outcomes. Results: All 97 patients were included for analysis. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups. The median duration of PP was 81 hours, and the median number of PP sessions was 5 times. PP improved oxygenation and ventilator parameters. The incidence of complications during PP was low, with pressure sores being the most frequent (10.2%). The 30-day survival was significantly higher in the PP group (67.3% Conclusions: When initiated within 24 hours of ECMO, PP can improve 30-day survival in patients with ARDS receiving VV-ECMO. In addition, it may improve the successful ECMO weaning rate and reduce the duration of ECMO support. However, considering the limitations, more strictly designed, large sample prospective randomized controlled trials are proposed. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300075326.

Indexed as

acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)adultextracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)Prone positioning (PP)

Identifiers

PMID38505030
PMCPMC10944719
OpenAlexW4391585814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.