ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024
Optimal antithrombotic strategy following valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic and mitral valve replacement.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mitral Valve Repair vs. Replacement: Hemodynamics in Valve Surgery.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of Anticoagulation on Valve Hemodynamics Following Transcatheter Valve-In-Valve Implantation.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of aortic and mitral valve disease requiring replacement has shifted to an increasing use of bioprosthetic heart valves. Due to their limited durability, there is a growing need for reintervention in the setting of failing bioprosthesis. Even though the gold standard for the treatment of failed bioprosthesis remains surgical repair or replacement, valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic and mitral valve replacement have emerged as safe and effective alternatives for patients who are at high or prohibitive risk for surgery. Both procedures are associated with a substantial risk of postprocedural thromboembolic events and valvular thrombosis that is often higher than transcatheter replacement of native valves. With guidelines lacking specific protocols and a limited number of available studies, the optimal postprocedural antithrombotic therapy remains to be clarified. Multiple factors including valvular hemodynamics, the characteristics of the failing surgical valve, and the choice of the new transcatheter heart valve (THV) must be considered. Additionally, patients are often at an advanced age with multiple comorbidities and may require oral anticoagulation (OAC) due to other indications such as atrial fibrillation. Although the recommended antithrombotic strategy for native transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is antiplatelet monotherapy with aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor in the absence of another anticoagulation indication, the use of oral anticoagulants including vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct thrombin inhibitors has been shown to be effective in reducing valvular thrombosis and are commonly used after ViV procedures. Prospective studies investigating these results specifically for ViV transcatheter aortic and mitral valve replacement are needed to identify the optimal antithrombotic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.