Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38504964›Full record

ArticleBeyoglu eye journal2024

Assessing the Efficacy of the PAUL Glaucoma Implant in Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma.

Ali Olgun, Murat Karapapak

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beyoglu eye journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Paul Glaucoma Implant: a systematic review of safety, efficacy, and emerging applications.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Systematic Review of the PAUL Glaucoma Implant.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ali OlgunWest Eye Hospital, Erbil, Iraq.
Murat KarapapakDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes and complications associated with PAUL glaucoma implant (PGI) surgery in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG) patients, comparing them with a primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) control group. Methods: A retrospective analysis included 39 PXG and 29 POAG eyes undergoing PGI surgery between January 2020 and December 2022. Surgical success was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) between ≤21 and ≥6 mmHg at 12 months and no loss of light perception. Demographic data, ocular examinations, and complications were recorded. Results: PXG patients (68.5±9.9 years) differed significantly in age from POAG patients (54.1±10.6 years) (p<0.05). Surgical success rates at 12 months were 97.4% (PXG) and 86.2% (POAG). No significant inter-group differences in gender, laterality, lens status, vertical cup/disc ratio, or pre-operative best-corrected visual acuity were observed. Mean IOP comparisons showed significant differences within both groups (p<0.001). Ripcord suture removal occurred at mean 30.3±7.43 days (PXG) and 30.6±9.89 days (POAG). Median pre-operative AGM use was 4 (PXG) and 3 (POAG). No significant differences were noted postoperatively. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the results of PGI in PXG and POAG, demonstrating a remarkable success rate and limited complications. Encouragingly, PXG patients with a history of unsuccessful filtration surgery demonstrated positive outcomes. The findings affirm PGI as a promising surgical intervention for PXG and POAG, exhibiting high success rates and manageable complications.

Indexed as

Glaucoma drainage devicesPAUL glaucoma implantprimary open-angle glaucomapseudoexfoliation glaucomasurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID38504964
PMCPMC10944855
OpenAlexW4392396481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.