ArticleBeyoglu eye journal2024
Treatment of Infantile Esotropia - Comparison Between Botulinum Toxin A and Bilateral Medial Rectus Recession.
Article in Beyoglu eye journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of botulinum toxin and surgery in managing acute acquired comitant esotropia.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2025Article
- Review
- Long-Term Motor and Sensory Outcomes of Infantile Esotropia following Bilateral Medial Rectus Recession: A Survival Analysis and Real-World Results.Journal of current ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of the study is to evaluate the examination findings, treatment methods, and follow-up results of children diagnosed with infantile esotropia (IE) and to compare botulinum toxin A (BTA) and bilateral medial rectus (MR) recession surgery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who were diagnosed with IE. The age of the patient and the angle of deviation were taken into account to determine the treatment. Patients who underwent bilateral MR recession surgery and BTA injection were analyzed and the BTA and surgical groups were compared. Successful correction was defined as orthotropia and a deviation of up to 10 prism diopters (PD) after one surgical procedure or 1-3 botulinum injections. Results: Two hundred and forty-six patients with esotropia were included in the study. Twelve were followed up with refractive correction only. BTA injection was administered to 110 patients, while 124 patients underwent bilateral MR recession. The age of the patients ranged from three to 39 months. Patients were followed for at least 6 months, with a mean follow-up of 24.3 months in the BTA group and 21.7 months in the surgical group (p=0.23). The mean pre-treatment angle deviation was 38.9 PD in the BTA group and 40.1 PD in the surgical group (p=0.62). The success rate for patients with more than 30 PD of deviation was 72% in the surgical group compared to 36% in the BTA group (p<0.001). No statistically significant difference in success rate was observed in patients with deviations <30 PD (surgery 62%, BTA 55%, p=0.26). Conclusion: Surgical treatment of IE was more successful than BTA injection in patients with large angle deviations (>30 PD). BTA injection can be considered as an alternative to surgery in cases of small to moderate angle deviations (<30 PD).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.