Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38504954›Full record

ArticleGlobal ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology2023

Human appropriation of net primary production as driver of change in landscape-scale vertebrate richness.

Karina Reiter, Christoph Plutzar, Dietmar Moser, Philipp Semenchuk, Karl-Heinz Erb, Franz Essl, Andreas Gattringer, Helmut Haberl, Fridolin Krausmann, Bernd Lenzner and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Phase synchronization between culture and climate forcing.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Karina ReiterDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3416-4287
Christoph PlutzarInstitute of Social Ecology (SEC) University of Natural Resources and Life Science (BOKU) Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2041-6399
Dietmar MoserDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2745-7508
Philipp SemenchukDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Karl-Heinz ErbInstitute of Social Ecology (SEC) University of Natural Resources and Life Science (BOKU) Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8335-4159
Franz EsslDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8253-2112
Andreas GattringerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Helmut HaberlInstitute of Social Ecology (SEC) University of Natural Resources and Life Science (BOKU) Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2104-5446
Fridolin KrausmannInstitute of Social Ecology (SEC) University of Natural Resources and Life Science (BOKU) Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9995-2372
Bernd LenznerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2616-3479
Johannes WesselyDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7753-3532
Sarah MatejInstitute of Social Ecology (SEC) University of Natural Resources and Life Science (BOKU) Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-4189
Robin PouteauFrench National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), AMAP Lab, France & Réunion Marseille France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3090-6551
Stefan DullingerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3919-0887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Land use is the most pervasive driver of biodiversity loss. Predicting its impact on species richness (SR) is often based on indicators of habitat loss. However, the degradation of habitats, especially through land-use intensification, also affects species. Here, we evaluate whether an integrative metric of land-use intensity, the human appropriation of net primary production, is correlated with the decline of SR in used landscapes across the globe. Location: Global. Time period: Present. Major taxa studied: Birds, mammals and amphibians. Methods: Based on species range maps (spatial resolution: 20 km × 20 km) and an area-of-habitat approach, we calibrated a "species-energy model" by correlating the SR of three groups of vertebrates with net primary production and biogeographical covariables in "wilderness" areas (i.e., those where available energy is assumed to be still at pristine levels). We used this model to project the difference between pristine SR and the SR corresponding to the energy remaining in used landscapes (i.e., SR loss expected owing to human energy extraction outside wilderness areas). We validated the projected species loss by comparison with the realized and impending loss reconstructed from habitat conversion and documented by national Red Lists. Results: Species-energy models largely explained landscape-scale variation of mapped SR in wilderness areas (adjusted Main conclusions: Our results suggest that the human appropriation of net primary production is a useful indicator of heterotrophic species loss in used landscapes, hence we recommend its inclusion in models based on species-area relationships to improve predictions of land-use-driven biodiversity loss.

Indexed as

biodiversity lossextinctionhuman appropriationland usenet primary productionspecies–energy relationshipspecies richnessthreatened species

Identifiers

PMID38504954
PMCPMC10946509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.