Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38504774›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2022

Potential for positive biodiversity outcomes under diet-driven land use change in Great Britain.

Henry Ferguson-Gow, Owen Nicholas, Charlotte Outhwaite, Rosie Green, Pauline Scheelbeek, Patricia Eustachio Colombo, Amber Wheeler, Anna Taylor, Alan D Dangour, Georgina Mace and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Natural capital approaches for the optimal design of policies for nature recovery.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Henry Ferguson-GowCentre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London, London, Greater London, WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7151-6421
Owen NicholasDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, Greater London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Charlotte OuthwaiteCentre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London, London, Greater London, WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9997-6780
Rosie GreenCentre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, Greater London, WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5850-6715
Pauline ScheelbeekCentre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, Greater London, WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6209-2284
Patricia Eustachio ColomboCentre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, Greater London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Amber WheelerThe Food Foundation, London, Greater London, SW9 7QD, UK.
Anna TaylorThe Food Foundation, London, Greater London, SW9 7QD, UK.
Alan D DangourCentre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, Greater London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Georgina MaceCentre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London, London, Greater London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Richard G PearsonCentre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London, London, Greater London, WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3458-0539

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A shift toward human diets that include more fruit and vegetables, and less meat is a potential pathway to improve public health and reduce food system-related greenhouse gas emissions. Associated changes in land use could include conversion of grazing land into horticulture, which makes more efficient use of land per unit of dietary energy and frees-up land for other uses. Methods: Here we use Great Britain as a case study to estimate potential impacts on biodiversity from converting grazing land to a mixture of horticulture and natural land covers by fitting species distribution models for over 800 species, including pollinating insects and species of conservation priority. Results: Across several land use scenarios that consider the current ratio of domestic fruit and vegetable production to imports, our statistical models suggest a potential for gains to biodiversity, including a tendency for more species to gain habitable area than to lose habitable area. Moreover, the models suggest that climate change impacts on biodiversity could be mitigated to a degree by land use changes associated with dietary shifts. Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrates that options exist for changing agricultural land uses in a way that can generate win-win-win outcomes for biodiversity, adaptation to climate change and public health.

Indexed as

biodiversityconservationdietsland use changepublic healthspecies distribution modeling

Identifiers

PMID38504774
PMCPMC10948972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.