ArticleGhana medical journal2023
The risk of prematurity in Cameroonian children born after in vitro fertilisation.
Article in Ghana medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the risk of prematurity in Cameroonian children born after in vitro Fertilisation. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: Conducted at the pediatric department of the Hospital Center for Research and Application in Endoscopic Surgery and Human Reproduction (HCRAESHR) in Yaoundé over eight months. Participants: Every newborn born after in vitro fertilisation (exposed group) and those born after spontaneous conception (non-exposed group) from a singleton pregnancy were included. Multiple pregnancies were excluded. One hundred newborns per group were recruited and matched according to the mode of delivery. Interventions: The main outcome measure was prematurity at birth. Data were collected from the medical records of the newborns and reported on individual questionnaires. The t Student test was used to assess the differences in gestational age between the two groups. The generalised linear model using binomial probability distribution was used for multivariate analysis to determine prematurity risk factors. All results with a p-value ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Prematurity was significantly predominant in the exposed group (22% and 5%, respectively, p=0.002) compared to the non-exposed group. The risk of prematurity in the exposed group was 4.4 times higher than in the non-exposed group. After controlling for confounders (the maternal age, the sex of the baby, and maternal hypertension), this risk increased significantly from 4.4 to 7.67 (p=0.001). Conclusion: This study demonstrated the first evidence from our part of the world showing that in vitro fertilisation is an absolute risk of prematurity. Funding: None declared.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.