Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38504524›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2024

Self-identified strategies to manage intake of tempting foods: cross-sectional and prospective associations with BMI and snack intake.

Jennifer Gatzemeier, Laura L Wilkinson, Menna J Price, Michelle D Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer GatzemeierSchool of Psychology, Swansea University, SA2 8PPSwansea, UK.
Laura L WilkinsonSchool of Psychology, Swansea University, SA2 8PPSwansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8093-0843
Menna J PriceSchool of Psychology, Swansea University, SA2 8PPSwansea, UK.
Michelle D LeeSchool of Psychology, Swansea University, SA2 8PPSwansea, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIndividuals often use self-directed strategies to manage intake of tempting foods, but what these strategies are and whether they are effective is not well understood. This study assessed the frequency of use and subjective effectiveness of self-directed strategies in relation to BMI and snack intake.

designA cross-sectional and prospective study with three time points (T1: baseline, T2: 3 months and T3: 3 years). At T1, demographics, frequency of use and subjective effectiveness of forty-one identified strategies were assessed. At T2 and T3, current weight was reported, and at T2 frequency of snack intake was also recorded.

settingOnline study in the UK.

participantsData from 368 participants (M

resultsTwo strategy factors were identified via principal axis factoring: (1) diet, exercise, reduction of temptations, and cognitive strategies, and (2) planning, preparation and eating style. For strategy 1, frequency of use, but not subjective effectiveness, was positively related to BMI at T1. Subjective effectiveness predicted an increase in BMI from T1 and T2 to T3. No relationship to snack intake was found. For strategy 2, frequency of use was negatively related to BMI at T1. Neither frequency of use nor subjective effectiveness were related to changes in BMI over time, but subjective effectiveness was negatively correlated with unhealthy snack intake.

conclusionSelf-directed strategies to reduce the intake of tempting foods are not consistently related to BMI or snack intake.

Indexed as

DietSnacksAdultBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorHumansProspective StudiesBMISnack intakeStrategiesTempting foodWeight management

Identifiers

PMID38504524
PMCPMC11036431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.