Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38504369›Full record

ArticleGlobal health research and policy2024

Development of the China's list of ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs): a study protocol.

Jianjian Wang, Dong Roman Xu, Yan Zhang, Hongqiao Fu, Sijiu Wang, Ke Ju, Chu Chen, Lian Yang, Weiyan Jian, Lei Chen and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health research and policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jianjian WangHEOA Group, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Dong Roman XuSchool of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan ZhangSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Hongqiao FuDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Sijiu WangVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Ke JuSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Chu ChenSchool of Health Management, Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China.
Lian YangSchool of Public Health, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Weiyan JianDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Lei ChenDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoyang LiaoGeneral Practice Ward/International Medical Center Ward, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yue XiaoChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.
Ruixian WuCenter for Health Statistics and Information, National Health Commission, Beijing, China.
Mihajlo JakovljevicInstitute of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Yaolong ChenResearch Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2021RU017), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China. chenyaolong@lzu.edu.cn.
Jay PanHEOA Group, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. panjie.jay@scu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-9501-1535

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1178967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe hospitalization rate of ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) has been recognized as an essential indicator reflective of the overall performance of healthcare system. At present, ACSCs has been widely used in practice and research to evaluate health service quality and efficiency worldwide. The definition of ACSCs varies across countries due to different challenges posed on healthcare systems. However, China does not have its own list of ACSCs. The study aims to develop a list to meet health system monitoring, reporting and evaluation needs in China.

methodsTo develop the list, we will combine the best methodological evidence available with real-world evidence, adopt a systematic and rigorous process and absorb multidisciplinary expertise. Specific steps include: (1) establishment of working groups; (2) generations of the initial list (review of already published lists, semi-structured interviews, calculations of hospitalization rate); (3) optimization of the list (evidence evaluation, Delphi consensus survey); and (4) approval of a final version of China's ACSCs list. Within each step of the process, we will calculate frequencies and proportions, use descriptive analysis to summarize and draw conclusions, discuss the results, draft a report, and refine the list. DISCUSSION: Once completed, China's list of ACSCs can be used to comprehensively evaluate the current situation and performance of health services, identify flaws and deficiencies embedded in the healthcare system to provide evidence-based implications to inform decision-makings towards the optimization of China's healthcare system. The experiences might be broadly applicable and serve the purpose of being a prime example for nations with similar conditions.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care Sensitive ConditionsHospitalizationChinaHumansAmbulatory care sensitive conditionsAvoidable hospitalizationsPrimary careQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID38504369
PMCPMC10949688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.