Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38504308›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2024

Evolution of compound eye morphology underlies differences in vision between closely related Drosophila species.

Alexandra D Buffry, John P Currea, Franziska A Franke-Gerth, Ravindra Palavalli-Nettimi, Andrew J Bodey, Christoph Rau, Nazanin Samadi, Stefan J Gstöhl, Christian M Schlepütz, Alistair P McGregor and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Population Morphology Implies a Common Developmental Blueprint forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Selection drives divergence of eye morphology in sympatric Heliconius butterflies.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Alexandra D Buffry *Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK.
John P Currea *Integrative Biology and Physiology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Franziska A Franke-GerthMolecular Evolution and Systematics of Animals, Institute of Biology, University of Leipzig, Talstrasse 33, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Ravindra Palavalli-NettimiInstitute of the Environment and Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Andrew J BodeyDiamond Light Source Ltd, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, UK.
Christoph RauDiamond Light Source Ltd, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, UK.
Nazanin SamadiSwiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, Forschungsstrasse 111, 5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
Stefan J GstöhlSwiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, Forschungsstrasse 111, 5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
Christian M SchlepützSwiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, Forschungsstrasse 111, 5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
Alistair P McGregorDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.
Lauren Sumner-RooneyMuseum Für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Research, Berlin, 10115, Germany.
Jamie TheobaldInstitute of the Environment and Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Maike KittelmannDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK. maike.kittelmann@brookes.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9710-1136
Paul Scherrer Institute · CHDiamond Light Source · GBFlorida International University · USOxford Brookes University · GBDurham University · GBLeipzig University · DEMuseum für Naturkunde · DE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T000317/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsects have evolved complex visual systems and display an astonishing range of adaptations for diverse ecological niches. Species of Drosophila melanogaster subgroup exhibit extensive intra- and interspecific differences in compound eye size. These differences provide an excellent opportunity to better understand variation in insect eye structure and the impact on vision. Here we further explored the difference in eye size between D. mauritiana and its sibling species D. simulans.

resultsWe confirmed that D. mauritiana have rapidly evolved larger eyes as a result of more and wider ommatidia than D. simulans since they recently diverged approximately 240,000 years ago. The functional impact of eye size, and specifically ommatidia size, is often only estimated based on the rigid surface morphology of the compound eye. Therefore, we used 3D synchrotron radiation tomography to measure optical parameters in 3D, predict optical capacity, and compare the modelled vision to in vivo optomotor responses. Our optical models predicted higher contrast sensitivity for D. mauritiana, which we verified by presenting sinusoidal gratings to tethered flies in a flight arena. Similarly, we confirmed the higher spatial acuity predicted for Drosophila simulans with smaller ommatidia and found evidence for higher temporal resolution.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates that even subtle differences in ommatidia size between closely related Drosophila species can impact the vision of these insects. Therefore, further comparative studies of intra- and interspecific variation in eye morphology and the consequences for vision among other Drosophila species, other dipterans and other insects are needed to better understand compound eye structure-function and how the diversification of eye size, shape, and function has helped insects to adapt to the vast range of ecological niches.

Indexed as

DrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterAnimalsEyeSpecies SpecificityAcuityContrastDrosophilaEvolutionEye sizeField of viewOmmatidiaOptic lobeVision

Identifiers

PMID38504308
PMCPMC10953123
OpenAlexW4392953232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.