ArticleBMC health services research2024
Utilization of routine health data and its determinants among healthcare workers in public health facilities of harari region, eastern Ethiopia.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stillbirth and newborn data quality and use and related input and process factors: findings of the IMPULSE study in Uganda.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Level and predictors of routine health management information system data management practice among health professionals working at public health facilities in Dire Dawa administration, eastern Ethiopia.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Utilization of routine health information system and its determinants among healthcare professionals in public health facilities of Banadir region, Somalia: A cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Article
- Surviving institutional contradictions: routine data use practices at the subnational levels.Oxford open digital health · 2026Article
- Utilisation of routine health information system and associated factors among health workers in public health institutions of Gofa zone, South Ethiopia regional state:a mixed-methods study.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Effect of Augmented Capacity Development Interventions (ACDI) on Information Utilization for Decision-Making in the Routine Health Information System in Public Health Institutions of Gofa Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.Health services insights · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoutine health information is the pillar of the planning and management of health services and plays a vital role in effective and efficient health service delivery, decision making, and program improvement. Little is known about evidence-based actions to successively advance the use of information for decision making. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the level and determinants of routine health data utilization among health workers in public health facilities in the Harari region, Ethiopia.
methodsAn institutional-based cross-sectional study design was used from June 1 to July 31, 2020. A total of 410 health care providers from two hospitals and five health centers were selected using a simple random sampling technique. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire complemented by an observational checklist. The collected data were thoroughly checked, coding, and entered into Epi-data version 4.6 before being transferred to Stata version 14 for analysis. Frequency and cross-tabulations were performed. To measure factors associated with routine use of health data, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyzes were performed. The odds ratio with a 95% CI was calculated, and then a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
resultThe general utilization of routine health data was 65.6%. The use of routine health data was significantly associated with healthcare workers who had a positive attitude towards data [AOR = 4 (2.3-6.9)], received training [AOR = 2.1 (1.3-3.6)], had supportive supervision [AOR = 3.6 (2.1-6.2)], received regular feedback [AOR = 2.9 (1.7-5.0)] and perceived a culture of information use [AOR = 2.5 (1.3-4.6)].
conclusionsSixty percent of health professionals had used routine health data utilization. Training, supervision, feedback, and the perceived culture of information were independently associated with the use of routine health data utilization. Therefore, it is critical to focus on improving data utilization practices by addressing factors that influence the use of routine health data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.