Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38504261›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2024

Coping with breast cancer during medical and occupational rehabilitation: a qualitative study of strategies and contextual factors.

Paula Heidkamp, Kati Hiltrop, Clara Breidenbach, Christoph Kowalski, Holger Pfaff, Franziska Geiser, Nicole Ernstmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Returning to Work after Breast Cancer: A One-Year Mixed-Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paula HeidkampUniversity Hospital Bonn, Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, Bonn, Germany. paula.heidkamp@ukbonn.de.
Kati HiltropUniversity Hospital Bonn, Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, Bonn, Germany.
Clara BreidenbachUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Chair of Health Services Research, Cologne, Germany.
Christoph KowalskiGerman Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.
Holger PfaffUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences & Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Chair of Quality Development and Evaluation in Rehabilitation, Cologne, Germany.
Franziska GeiserUniversity Hospital Bonn, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Bonn, Germany.
Nicole ErnstmannUniversity Hospital Bonn, Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, Bonn, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEGerman Cancer Society · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of the coping processes of breast cancer survivors (BCSs) during medical and occupational rehabilitation after acute treatment.

methodsThis study is part of the mixed-methods Breast Cancer Patients' Return to Work study conducted in Germany. Data were collected through semistructured interviews with 26 female BCSs 5-6 years after their diagnosis. A qualitative content analysis was conducted to investigate the coping strategies and contextual factors of coping of BCSs.

resultsThe participants used different strategies for coping with their breast cancer, namely, approach- versus avoidance-oriented coping and emotion- versus problem-focused coping. During the medical rehabilitation process, coping behavior was used mainly to address disease management and its consequences. During the occupational rehabilitation process, most coping strategies were used to overcome discrepancies between the patient's current work capacity and the job requirements. The contextual factors of coping were in the health, healthcare, work-related, and personal domains.

conclusionThe study findings provide in-depth insights into the coping processes for BCSs during the rehabilitation phase and highlight the importance of survivorship care after acute cancer treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The results indicate that BCSs employ approach- and avoidance-oriented strategies to cope with their cancer during rehabilitation. As both attempts are helpful in the short term to cope with physical and emotional consequences of the cancer, healthcare and psychosocial personnel should respect the coping strategies of BCSs while also being aware of the potential long-term negative impact of avoidance-oriented coping on the rehabilitation process.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsAdaptation, PsychologicalCoping SkillsFemaleHumansSurvivorsCancerCancer survivorshipCopingOncologyQualitativeRehabilitationReturn to work

Identifiers

PMID38504261
PMCPMC10949761
OpenAlexW4392964354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.