Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38504214›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Facilitators and barriers to home blood pressure monitoring among pregnant women in Ghana: a mixed-methods analysis of patient perspectives.

Noah Newman, Titus K Beyuo, Betty A Nartey, Elorm Segbedzi-Rich, Andrea Pangori, Cheryl A Moyer, Jody R Lori, Samuel A Oppong, Emma R Lawrence

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Noah NewmanUniversity of Michigan Medical School, 1301 Catherine St., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Titus K BeyuoUniversity of Ghana Medical School, P.O. Box 4236, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana. drbeyuo@gmail.com.
Betty A NarteyKorle Bu Teaching Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ghana Medical School, P.O. Box KB 77, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Elorm Segbedzi-RichKorle Bu Teaching Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ghana Medical School, P.O. Box KB 77, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Andrea PangoriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Cheryl A MoyerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Jody R LoriUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA.
Samuel A OppongUniversity of Ghana Medical School, P.O. Box 4236, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Emma R LawrenceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
University of Michigan · USKorle Bu Teaching Hospital · GH

Funding

Home blood pressure monitoring among women at risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in GhanaK01TW012166 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Emma Rachel Lawrence · 2022 to 2026
$983k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW012166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefit of home blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy and in low-resource settings is incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences, barriers, and facilitators of home blood pressure monitoring among pregnant women in Ghana.

methodsThis concurrent triangulation mixed-methods study was conducted at an urban tertiary hospital in Ghana. Participants were recruited from adult pregnant women presenting for routine antenatal care. Upon enrollment, participants' demographics and history were collected. At the next study visit, participants received audiovisual and hands-on training on using an automatic blood pressure monitor; they then monitored and logged their blood pressure daily at home for 2-4 weeks. At the final study visit, verbally administered surveys and semi-structured interviews assessed participant's experiences. Quantitative data were analyzed using R version 4.2.2, and frequencies and descriptive statistics were calculated. Qualitative data were imported into DeDoose 9.0.78 for thematic analysis.

resultsOf 235 enrolled participants, 194 completed surveys; of those, 33 completed in-depth interviews. Participants' mean age was 31.6 (SD 5.3) years, 32.1% had not previously given birth, and 31.1% had less than a senior high school education. On a 4-point Likert scale, the majority reported they "definitely" were able to remember (n = 134, 69.1%), could find the time (n = 124, 63.9%), had the energy (n = 157, 80.9%), could use the blood pressure monitor without problems (n = 155, 79.9%), and had family approval (n = 182, 96.3%) while engaging in home blood pressure monitoring. 95.88% (n = 186) believed that pregnant women in Ghana should monitor their blood pressure at home. Qualitative thematic analysis demonstrated that most participants liked home blood pressure monitoring because of increased knowledge of their health during pregnancy. While most participants found measuring their blood pressure at home doable, many faced challenges. Participants' experiences with five key factors influenced how easy or difficult their experience was: 1) Time, stress, and daily responsibilities; 2) Perceived importance of BP in pregnancy; 3) Role of family; 4) Capability of performing monitoring; 5) Convenience of monitoring.

conclusionsAmong pregnant women in urban Ghana, home blood pressure monitoring was perceived as positive, important, and doable; however, challenges must be addressed.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryPregnant PeopleAdultBlood PressureFemaleGhanaHumansPregnancyPrenatal CareEclampsiaGhanaHBPMHome blood pressure monitoringHypertensive disorderLMICPreeclampsiaPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38504214
PMCPMC10949704
OpenAlexW4392956365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.