Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38504212›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2024

Spanish validation of the short version of the racing and crowded thoughts questionnaire (RCTQ-13).

Daniela Garcés Rodríguez, Juan Pablo Zapata-Ospina, María Mercedes Uribe, Diana Suarez, Luis Fernando Tabares, Luisa Fernanda Ahunca, Daniel Camilo Aguirre, Jorge Carlos Holguín, Jenny García Valencia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela Garcés RodríguezDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
Juan Pablo Zapata-OspinaInstitute of Medical Research, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia. juanp.zapata@udea.edu.co.
María Mercedes UribeHospital Mental de Antioquia, Bello, Colombia.
Diana SuarezHospital Alma Máter de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
Luis Fernando TabaresHospital Alma Máter de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
Luisa Fernanda AhuncaHospital San Vicente Fundacion, Medellin, Colombia.
Daniel Camilo AguirreInstitute of Medical Research, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
Jorge Carlos HolguínDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
Jenny García ValenciaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
Universidad de Antioquia · COHospital Universitario de San Vicente Fundación · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Racing and Crowded Thoughts Questionnaire (RCTQ-13) is the most widely used specific scale for the measurement of racing thoughts, but there is currently no Spanish version that allow the evaluation in Spanish-speaking patients. The objective of this study is to translate, adapt, and validate the RCTQ-13 in a Colombian population with affective disorders.

methodsThe questionnaire was translated and back-translated, and corrections were implemented following a pilot test to improve comprehensibility. We included patients with Bipolar I Disorder and with Major depressive disorder seen in three centers in the city of Medellín, Colombia. We evaluate structural validity with confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Construct validity was also assessed with the comparison between euthymic, maniac, and depressive episodes and the correlation with worry, rumination, and mania scales. Responsiveness was measured 1 month after the first evaluation. Based on item response theory (IRT), we also estimated item difficulty, discrimination, and fit using a generalized partial credit model.

resultsTwo hundred fifty subjects were included. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the three-factor structure of the scale was appropriate. Internal consistency was adequate for the entire scale (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.94-0.96) and for each factor. Test-retest reliability was good (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.82, 95%IC: 0.70-0.88). For construct validity, we observed differences between patients with different types of affective episodes, a moderate positive correlation with the Penn State Worry Scale (r = 0.55) and the Ruminative Response Scale (r = 0.42), and a low negative correlation with the Young Mania Rating Scale (r = - 0.10). Responsiveness was proved to be adequate. Under IRT, the response thresholds for the response options are organized for all items. The infit was adequate for all items and the outfit was acceptable.

conclusionsThe Spanish version of the RCTQ-13 is a reliable, valid, and responsive scale and can be used for the clinical assessment of the construct of racing and crowded thoughts in patients with the spectrum of affective disorders in whom this experience can be expressed with different nuances. Further research is needed to expand the relationship with rumination and worry.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderHumansManiaPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAnxietyBipolar disorderDepressive disorderPsychometricsPsychopathologyRacing and crowded thoughtsThinking

Identifiers

PMID38504212
PMCPMC10953190
OpenAlexW4392953718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.