Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38504104›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Genetic gains underpinning a little-known strawberry Green Revolution.

Mitchell J Feldmann, Dominique D A Pincot, Glenn S Cole, Steven J Knapp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Why usefulness is rarely useful.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mitchell J FeldmannDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7257-3401
Dominique D A PincotDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Glenn S ColeDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2083-6406
Steven J KnappDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. sjknapp@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6498-5409

Funding

California Strawberry Commission NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The annual production of strawberry has increased by one million tonnes in the US and 8.4 million tonnes worldwide since 1960. Here we show that the US expansion was driven by genetic gains from Green Revolution breeding and production advances that increased yields by 2,755%. Using a California population with a century-long breeding history and phenotypes of hybrids observed in coastal California environments, we estimate that breeding has increased fruit yields by 2,974-6,636%, counts by 1,454-3,940%, weights by 228-504%, and firmness by 239-769%. Using genomic prediction approaches, we pinpoint the origin of the Green Revolution to the early 1950s and uncover significant increases in additive genetic variation caused by transgressive segregation and phenotypic diversification. Lastly, we show that the most consequential Green Revolution breeding breakthrough was the introduction of photoperiod-insensitive, PERPETUAL FLOWERING hybrids in the 1970s that doubled yields and drove the dramatic expansion of strawberry production in California.

Indexed as

FragariaEnvironmentGenomicsPhenotypePlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID38504104
PMCPMC10951273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.