Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38504068›Full record

Observational studyHead and neck pathology2024

BRAF p.V600E Mutational Status Does Not Correlate with Biological Behavior in Conventional Ameloblastomas: A Disease-Free Survival Analysis.

Allan Vinícius Martins-de-Barros, Fábio Andrey da Costa Araújo, Tatiane Fonseca Faro, Arthur Alves Thomaz de Aquino, Adauto Gomes Barbosa Neto, Helker Albuquerque Macedo da Silva, Elker Lene Santos de Lima, Maria Tereza Cartaxo Muniz, Emanuel Dias de Oliveira E Silva, Marianne de Vasconcelos Carvalho

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Head and neck pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Allan Vinícius Martins-de-BarrosPost-Graduation Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Fábio Andrey da Costa AraújoPost-Graduation Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. fabio.andrey@upe.br.
Tatiane Fonseca FaroPost-Graduation Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Arthur Alves Thomaz de AquinoUndergraduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Adauto Gomes Barbosa NetoInstituto de Ciências Biológicas (ICB/UPE), University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Helker Albuquerque Macedo da SilvaInstituto de Ciências Biológicas (ICB/UPE), University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Elker Lene Santos de LimaInstituto de Ciências Biológicas (ICB/UPE), University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Maria Tereza Cartaxo MunizInstituto de Ciências Biológicas (ICB/UPE), University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Emanuel Dias de Oliveira E SilvaPost-Graduation Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Marianne de Vasconcelos CarvalhoPost-Graduation Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Universidade de Pernambuco · BRHospital Universitário Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDysregulation of the MAPK pathway appears to exert a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of ameloblastomas, since BRAF p.V600E has been reported in over 65% of the tumors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether the BRAF p.V600E is related to biological behavior and disease-free survival in patients with conventional ameloblastomas.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study based on the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) recommendations. The study population consisted of individuals treated for conventional ameloblastomas. Clinical, imaging, histomorphological, immunohistochemical (Ki67 and CD138/syndecan-1), and molecular BRAF p.V600E mutation analyses were performed. Bivariate statistical analysis was performed through chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to identify predictors of disease-free survival, with a significance level of 5%.

resultsForty-one individuals were included, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.15:1. BRAF p.V600E mutation was identified in 75.6% of the tumors. No association between the BRAF mutational status and other clinical, imaging, histomorphological, and immunohistochemical variables was observed. Only the initial treatment modality was significantly associated with a better prognosis in univariate (p = 0.008) and multivariate (p = 0.030) analyses, with a hazard ratio of 9.60 (95%IC = 1.24-73.89), favoring radical treatment.

conclusionBRAF p.V600E mutation emerges as a prevalent molecular aberration in ameloblastomas. Nevertheless, it does not seem to significantly affect the tumor proliferative activity, CD138/syndecan-1-mediated cell adhesion, or disease-free survival outcomes.

Indexed as

AmeloblastomaDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafRetrospective StudiesSyndecan-1BRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSyndecan-1AmeloblastomaAntigen Ki67BRAF p.V600EDisease-free survivalSurvival analysisSyndecan-1

Identifiers

PMID38504068
PMCPMC10951168
OpenAlexW4392947105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.