Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38504036›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2024

Validation of the postoperative Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire after emergency surgery and association with quality of life at three months.

Victoria Le Bescond, Jonathan Petit-Phan, Maëva Campfort, Claire Nicolleau, Mathieu Conté, Guillaume Bouhours, Louis Rony, Sigismond Lasocki, Maxime Léger

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04845763 (Validation of the QoR-15 Score for Assessing Quality of Recovery From Emergency Surgery and Its Association With Long-term Quality of Life.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04845763 unknown statusnot on this map

Validation of the QoR-15 Score for Assessing Quality of Recovery From Emergency Surgery and Its Association With Long-term Quality of Life.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AngersRan2021 to 2022Enrolled375ConditionsQuality of Recovery, Perioperative Complication, Anesthesia, Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresArmsFQoR-15 questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Victoria Le BescondDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Health, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Jonathan Petit-PhanDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Health, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Maëva CampfortDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Health, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Claire NicolleauDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Health, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Mathieu ContéDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Health, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Guillaume BouhoursDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Health, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Louis RonyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Sigismond LasockiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Health, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Maxime LégerDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Health, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France. mxmleger@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5447-6595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) tool, validated for measuring postoperative recovery following scheduled surgeries, has not been psychometrically assessed in emergency contexts. Moreover, the QoR-15's associations with long-term outcomes remain underexplored. This study aimed to confirm the validity and reliability of the QoR-15 following emergency surgery and assess its association with three-month postoperative quality of life.

methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study (August 2021-April 2022) on adult patients who underwent emergency surgery. The QoR-15 questionnaire was administered before surgery (H0) and at 24 hr (H24) and 48 hr (H48) after surgery. We examined the H24 score's associations with both the three-month quality of life, as assessed by the EQ-5D scale, and the number of days spent at home at 30 (DAH30) and 90 (DAH90) days.

resultsOf the 375 included patients, 352 (94%) completed the QoR-15 at H24 and 338 (90%) were followed up at three months. The population represented the following diverse surgical specialties: orthopedic (51%), gastrointestinal (27%), urologic (13%), and others (9%). The QoR-15 questionnaire confirmed all psychometric qualities (internal consistency, reproducibility, responsiveness, acceptability, construct, and convergent validities) in the emergency context. The average minimum clinical difference was 8.0 at H24. There was an association between QoR-15 at H24 and the three-month quality of life (r = 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14 to 0.34; P < 0.001), DAH30 (r = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.41; P < 0.001), and DAH90 (r = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.40; P < 0.001).

conclusionThe QoR-15 score is valid for measuring early postoperative recovery after emergency surgery. The H24 score significantly correlated with both the three-month quality of life and the number of days at home. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04845763); first submitted 11 April 2021.

Indexed as

Anesthesia Recovery PeriodQuality of LifeAdultHumansProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesemergency surgerypatient health questionnairepatient-reported outcome measuresquality of lifequality of recovery

Identifiers

PMID38504036
PMCPMC11026244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.