Observational studyCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2024
Measurements of pupillary unrest using infrared pupillometry fail to detect changes in pain intensity in patients after surgery: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of opioids on the light-off pupillary reflex.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
- Pain assessment using physiological responses/markers in different types of pain: a scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe pupil displays chaotic oscillations, also referred to as pupillary unrest in ambient light (PUAL). As pain has previously been shown to increase pupillary unrest, the quantitative assessment of PUAL has been considered a possible tool to identify and quantify pain. Nevertheless, PUAL is affected by various states, such as vigilance, cognitive load, or emotional arousal, independent of pain. Furthermore, systematically applied opioids are known to reduce PUAL, thus potentially limiting its usefulness to detect pain or changes in pain intensity. To test the hypothesis that PUAL can reliably identify changes in pain intensity in a clinical setting, we measured PUAL in patients experiencing substantial pain relief when regional anesthesia interventions were applied after surgery.
methodsWe conducted an observational study at an academic surgery centre following institutional review board approval. Eighteen patients with unsatisfactory pain control following surgery underwent regional anesthesia procedures to improve pain control. We used infrared pupillometry to assess pupillary unrest before and after the regional block. We then compared the changes in pupillary unrest with the changes in pain scores (numeric rating scale [NRS], range 0-10).
resultsEighteen patients received epidural anesthesia (n = 14) or peripheral nerve blocks (n = 4), resulting in improvement of mean (standard deviation [SD]) NRS pain scores from 7.2 (1.7) to 1.9 (1.8) (difference in means, -2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.3 to -4.1; P < 0.001). Nevertheless, pupillary unrest did not change as pain decreased; the mean (SD) PUAL was 0.113 (0.062) before analgesia and 0.112 (0.068) after analgesia (difference in means, -0.001; 95% CI, -0.018 to 0.015; P = 0.88).
conclusionIn this prospective observational study, pupillometric measurements of pupillary unrest did not identify changes in pain intensity in a postoperative, predominantly opioid-exposed patient population. While the sample size was small, the use of measurements of pupillary unrest to detect and quantify pain has to be questioned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.