Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38504032›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2024

Oral docetaxel plus encequidar - A pharmacokinetic model and evaluation against IV docetaxel.

David Wang, Chris Jackson, Noelyn Hung, Tak Hung, Rudolf Kwan, Wing-Kai Chan, Albert Qin, Natalie J Hughes-Medlicott, Paul Glue, Stephen Duffull

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David WangDepartment of Anaesthesia, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand. David.wang@waikatodhb.health.nz.ORCID 0000-0001-5427-4961
Chris JacksonDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Noelyn HungDepartment of Pathology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Tak HungZenith Technology Limited, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Rudolf KwanAthenex Inc, New York, USA.
Wing-Kai ChanAthenex Inc, New York, USA.
Albert QinPharmaEssentia Corporation, Taipei, Taiwan.
Natalie J Hughes-MedlicottSchool of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Paul GlueDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Stephen DuffullCertara, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6545-9408
University of Otago · NZAthenex (United States) · USCertara (United States) · USWaikato Hospital · NZ

Funding

University of Otago Doctoral Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of optimized dosing regimens plays a crucial role in oncology drug development. This study focused on the population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation of docetaxel, comparing the pharmacokinetic exposure of oral docetaxel plus encequidar (oDox + E) with the standard of care intravenous (IV) docetaxel regimen. The aim was to evaluate the feasibility of oDox + E as a potential alternative to IV docetaxel. The article demonstrates an approach which aligns with the FDA's Project Optimus which aims to improve oncology drug development through model informed drug development (MIDD). The key question answered by this study was whether a feasible regimen of oDox + E existed. The purpose of this question was to provide an early GO / NO-GO decision point to guide drug development and improve development efficiency.

methodsA stepwise approach was employed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for total and unbound docetaxel plasma concentrations after IV docetaxel and oDox + E administration. Simulations were performed from the final model to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) for different oDox + E dose regimens (including multiple dose regimens) in relation to IV docetaxel using AUC over effective concentration (AUCOEC) metric across a range of effective concentrations (EC). A Go / No-Go framework was defined-the first part of the framework assessed whether a feasible oDox + E regimen existed (i.e., a PTA ≥ 80%), and the second part defined the conditions to proceed with a Go decision.

resultsThe overall population pharmacokinetic model consisted of a 3-compartment model with linear elimination, constant bioavailability, constant binding mechanics, and a combined error model. Simulations revealed that single dose oDox + E regimens did not achieve a PTA greater than 80%. However, two- and three-dose regimens at 600 mg achieved PTAs exceeding 80% for certain EC levels.

conclusionThe study demonstrates the benefits of MIDD using oDox + E as a motivating example. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed for the total and unbound concentration in plasma of docetaxel after administration of IV docetaxel and oDox + E. The model was used to simulate oDox + E dose regimens which were compared to the current standard of care IV docetaxel regimen. A GO / NO-GO framework was applied to determine whether oDox + E should progress to the next phase of drug development and whether any conditions should apply. A two or three-dose regimen of oDox + E at 600 mg was able to achieve non-inferior pharmacokinetic exposure to current standard of care IV docetaxel in simulations. A Conditional GO decision was made based on this result and further quantification of the "effective concentration" would improve the ability to optimise the dose regimen.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousDocetaxelModels, BiologicalAdministration, OralAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsArea Under CurveComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTherapeutic EquivalencyAntineoplastic AgentsDocetaxelDocetaxelModel informed drug developmentProject Optimus

Identifiers

PMID38504032
PMCPMC11254990
OpenAlexW4392935830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.