Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38504003›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2024

Families tackling adolescent anorexia nervosa: family wellbeing in family-based treatment or other interventions. A scoping review.

Signe Holm Pedersen, Dorthe Andersen Waage, Nadia Micali, Mette Bentz

Open access · diamondAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Participation in the New Maudsley Model Workshops is Associated With Reductions in Caregiver Burden in Eating Disorders.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Signe Holm PedersenChild and Adolescent Mental Health Center, Copenhagen University Hospital-Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, Denmark. signe.holm.pedersen@regionh.dk.
Dorthe Andersen WaageCenter for Eating and Feeding Disorders Research, Mental Health Center Ballerup, Copenhagen University Hospital - Mental Health Services CPH, Denmark, Ballerup, Denmark.
Nadia MicaliCenter for Eating and Feeding Disorders Research, Mental Health Center Ballerup, Copenhagen University Hospital - Mental Health Services CPH, Denmark, Ballerup, Denmark.
Mette BentzChild and Adolescent Mental Health Center, Copenhagen University Hospital-Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKCenter for Clinical & Basic Research · DKMental Health Services · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFamily-based treatment (FBT) has contributed significantly to the treatment of anorexia nervosa (AN) in young people (YP). However, parents are concerned that FBT and the active role of parents in the task of refeeding may have a negative impact on family relations. The aim of the review is to assess whether families engaged in FBT for AN are more or less impacted in their family wellbeing and caregiver burden, compared to families with a YP diagnosed with AN, who are not undergoing treatment with FBT.

methodComputerized searches across six databases complemented by a manual search resulted in 30 papers being included in the scoping review.

resultsThe review identified 19 longitudinal studies on change in family wellbeing in families in FBT-like treatments, and 11 longitudinal studies on change in family wellbeing in treatment where parents are not in charge of refeeding. Only three randomized controlled studies directly compare FBT to treatment without parent-led refeeding.

conclusionThe available research suggests no difference between intervention types regarding impact on family wellbeing. Approximately half of the studies find improvements in family wellbeing in both treatment with and without parent-led refeeding, while the same proportion find neither improvement nor deterioration. As parents play a pivotal role in FBT, there is a need for good quality studies to elucidate the impact of FBT on family wellbeing. Level of evidence Level V: Opinions of authorities, based on descriptive studies, narrative reviews, clinical experience, or reports of expert committees.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaFamily TherapyAdolescentCaregiver BurdenFamily RelationsHumansParentsTreatment OutcomeAnorexia nervosaAttachmentCarer burdenFamily-based treatmentFamily functionFamily relations

Identifiers

PMID38504003
PMCPMC10951015
OpenAlexW4393021442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.