Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38503987›Full record

ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2024

Advances in D-dimer testing: progress in harmonization of clinical assays and innovative detection methods.

Rong Zhao, Mengran Li, Peng Xiao, Dewei Song, Hongmei Li

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Method Comparison of Three Automated D-Dimer Assays.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Raising the D-dimer bar: a narrative review of the age-adjusted D-dimer threshold.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predictive Value of D-Dimer to Fibrinogen Ratio for Unfavorable Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Intravenous Thrombolysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rong ZhaoNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing, 100029, China.
Mengran LiBeijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, 100029, China.
Peng XiaoNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing, 100029, China.
Dewei SongNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing, 100029, China.
Hongmei LiNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing, 100029, China. lihm@nim.ac.cn.
National Institute of Metrology · CNBeijing University of Chemical Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The D-dimer is a sensitive indicator of coagulation and fibrinolysis activation, especially valuable as a biomarker of intravascular thrombosis. Measurement of plasma D-dimer levels plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and monitoring of conditions such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. A variety of immunoassays, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assays, whole-blood aggregation analysis, and immunochromatography assays, are widely used in clinical settings to determine D-dimer levels. However, the results obtained from different D-dimer assays vary significantly. These assays exhibit intra-method coefficients of variation ranging from 6.4% to 17.7%, and the measurement discrepancies among different assays can be as high as 20-fold. The accuracy and reliability of D-dimer testing cannot be guaranteed due to the lack of an internationally endorsed reference measurement system (including reference materials and reference measurement procedures), which may lead to misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis, limiting its full clinical application. In this review, we present an in-depth analysis of clinical D-dimer testing, summarizing the existing challenges, the current state of metrology, and progress towards harmonization. We also review the latest advancements in D-dimer detection techniques, which include mass spectrometry and electrochemical and optical immunoassays. By comparing the basic principles, the definition of the measurand, and analytical performance of these methods, we provide an outlook on the potential improvements in D-dimer clinical testing.

Indexed as

Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsBiomarkersEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansImmunoassayBiomarkersFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DClinical chemistryD-DimerImmunoassayMass spectrometryReference material

Identifiers

PMID38503987
OpenAlexW4393022135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.