Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38503943›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024

Near-real-time Mueller polarimetric image processing for neurosurgical intervention.

Stefano Moriconi, Omar Rodríguez-Núñez, Éléa Gros, Leonard A Felger, Theoni Maragkou, Ekkehard Hewer, Angelo Pierangelo, Tatiana Novikova, Philippe Schucht, Richard McKinley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefano MoriconiSupport Center for Advanced Neuroimaging (SCAN), University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. stefano.moriconi@insel.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5705-7839
Omar Rodríguez-NúñezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0280-9519
Éléa GrosInstitute of Tissue Medicine and Pathology, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0911-2792
Leonard A FelgerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Theoni MaragkouInstitute of Tissue Medicine and Pathology, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
Ekkehard HewerInstitute of Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9128-0364
Angelo PierangeloLPICM, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, IP Paris, 91120, Palaiseau, France.
Tatiana NovikovaLPICM, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, IP Paris, 91120, Palaiseau, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9048-9158
Philippe SchuchtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Richard McKinleySupport Center for Advanced Neuroimaging (SCAN), University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8250-6117
University of Bern · CHCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung CRSII5 20590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWide-field imaging Mueller polarimetry is a revolutionary, label-free, and non-invasive modality for computer-aided intervention; in neurosurgery, it aims to provide visual feedback of white matter fibre bundle orientation from derived parameters. Conventionally, robust polarimetric parameters are estimated after averaging multiple measurements of intensity for each pair of probing and detected polarised light. Long multi-shot averaging, however, is not compatible with real-time in vivo imaging, and the current performance of polarimetric data processing hinders the translation to clinical practice.

methodsA learning-based denoising framework is tailored for fast, single-shot, noisy acquisitions of polarimetric intensities. Also, performance-optimised image processing tools are devised for the derivation of clinically relevant parameters. The combination recovers accurate polarimetric parameters from fast acquisitions with near-real-time performance, under the assumption of pseudo-Gaussian polarimetric acquisition noise.

resultsThe denoising framework is trained, validated, and tested on experimental data comprising tumour-free and diseased human brain samples in different conditions. Accuracy and image quality indices showed significant (

conclusionThe end-to-end image processing achieved real-time performance for a localised field of view (

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeurosurgical ProceduresBrain NeoplasmsHumansSurgery, Computer-AssistedWhite MatterAIMueller polarimetric imagingNeurosurgeryReal-time denoising

Identifiers

PMID38503943
PMCPMC11178587
OpenAlexW4392490086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.