Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38503867›Full record

ReviewNature ecology & evolution2024

Contributions of human cultures to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation.

Carolina Levis, Bernardo M Flores, João Vitor Campos-Silva, Nivaldo Peroni, Arie Staal, Maíra C G Padgurschi, Wetherbee Dorshow, Bruno Moraes, Morgan Schmidt, Taku Wate Kuikuro and 10 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Indigenous territories and protected areas are crucial for ecosystem connectivity in the Amazon basin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Ten new insights in climate science 2024.One earth (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Carolina LevisPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil. carollevis@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8425-9479
Bernardo M FloresPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4555-5598
João Vitor Campos-SilvaInstituto Juruá, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4998-7216
Nivaldo PeroniPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-5377
Arie StaalCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5409-1436
Maíra C G PadgurschiInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8819-3147
Wetherbee DorshowDepartment of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Bruno MoraesEarth Analytic, Puente Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA.
Morgan SchmidtLaboratório de Estudos Interdisciplinares em Arqueologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Taku Wate KuikuroAssociação Indígena Kuikuro do Alto Xingu, Aldeia Ipatse, Território Indígena do Alto Xingu, Canarana and Gaúcha do Norte, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Huke KuikuroAssociação Indígena Kuikuro do Alto Xingu, Aldeia Ipatse, Território Indígena do Alto Xingu, Canarana and Gaúcha do Norte, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Kumessi WaujaAssociação Indígena Kuikuro do Alto Xingu, Aldeia Ipatse, Território Indígena do Alto Xingu, Canarana and Gaúcha do Norte, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Kalutata KuikuroAssociação Indígena Kuikuro do Alto Xingu, Aldeia Ipatse, Território Indígena do Alto Xingu, Canarana and Gaúcha do Norte, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Afukaka KuikuroAssociação Indígena Kuikuro do Alto Xingu, Aldeia Ipatse, Território Indígena do Alto Xingu, Canarana and Gaúcha do Norte, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Carlos FaustoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia Social, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0617-6643
Bruna FranchettoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia Social, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jennifer WatlingMuseum of Archaeology and Ethnology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7897-5105
Helena LimaMuseu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5787-7231
Michael HeckenbergerDepartment of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Charles R ClementInstituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8421-1029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expansion of globalized industrial societies is causing global warming, ecosystem degradation, and species and language extinctions worldwide. Mainstream conservation efforts still focus on nature protection strategies to revert this crisis, often overlooking the essential roles of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IP&LC) in protecting biodiversity and ecosystems globally. Here we assess the scientific literature to identify relationships between biodiversity (including ecosystem diversity) and cultural diversity, and investigate how these connections may affect conservation outcomes in tropical lowland South America. Our assessment reveals a network of interactions and feedbacks between biodiversity and diverse IP&LC, suggesting interconnectedness and interdependencies from which multiple benefits to nature and societies emerge. We illustrate our findings with five case studies of successful conservation models, described as consolidated or promising 'social-ecological hope spots', that show how engagement with IP&LC of various cultures may be the best hope for biodiversity and ecosystem conservation, particularly when aligned with science and technology. In light of these five inspiring cases, we argue that conservation science and policies need to recognize that protecting and promoting both biological and cultural diversities can provide additional co-benefits and solutions to maintain ecosystems resilient in the face of global changes.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesCultural DiversityEcosystemHumansIndigenous PeoplesSouth America

Identifiers

PMID38503867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.