Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38503827›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Investigation of deep learning model for predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment efficacy on contrast-enhanced computed tomography images of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Yasuhiko Nakao, Takahito Nishihara, Ryu Sasaki, Masanori Fukushima, Satoshi Miuma, Hisamitsu Miyaaki, Yuko Akazawa, Kazuhiko Nakao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yasuhiko NakaoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki, Japan. yasuhiko.dream.new.york@gmail.com.
Takahito NishiharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki, Japan.
Ryu SasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki, Japan.
Masanori FukushimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki, Japan.
Satoshi MiumaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki, Japan.
Hisamitsu MiyaakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yuko AkazawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki, Japan.
Kazuhiko NakaoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki, Japan.
Nagasaki University · JPObayashi (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-targeted agents for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is promising, individual response variability exists. Therefore, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model to predict treatment efficacy using pre-ICIs contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) imaging characteristics. We evaluated the efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in 43 patients at the Nagasaki University Hospital from 2020 to 2022 using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. A total of 197 Progressive Disease (PD), 271 Partial Response (PR), and 342 Stable Disease (SD) contrast CT images of HCC were used for training. We used ResNet-18 as the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model and YOLOv5, YOLOv7, YOLOv8 as the You Only Look Once (YOLO) model with precision-recall curves and class activation maps (CAMs) for diagnostic performance evaluation and model interpretation, respectively. The 3D t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding was used for image feature analysis. The YOLOv7 model demonstrated Precision 53.7%, Recall 100%, F1 score 69.8%, mAP@0.5 99.5% for PD, providing accurate and clinically versatile predictions by identifying decisive points. The ResNet-18 model had Precision 100% and Recall 100% for PD. However, the CAMs sites did not align with the tumors, suggesting the CNN model is not predicting that a given CT slice is PD, PR, or SD, but that it accurately predicts Individual Patient's CT slices. Preparing substantial training data for tumor drug effect prediction models is challenging compared to general tumor diagnosis models; hence, large-scale validation using an efficient YOLO model is warranted.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularDeep LearningLiver NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAICAMsCNNHCCYOLO

Identifiers

PMID38503827
PMCPMC10951210
OpenAlexW4392954931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.