ArticleScientific reports2024
Investigation of deep learning model for predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment efficacy on contrast-enhanced computed tomography images of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Response evaluation to systemic therapy in HCC: Current challenges and future perspectives.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Review
- From black-box prediction to transparent insight: the status quo and paradigm shift of explainable artificial intelligence in hepatocellular carcinoma research.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Neoadjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: emerging combinations and biomarker challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Immune Checkpoints and Tumor Microenvironment Modulation in Cancer Immunotherapy.Journal of immunology research · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of ferroptosis in primary hepatocellular carcinoma and progress of artificial intelligence-based predictive modeling in hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- A multimodal fusion system predicting survival benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Predicting Immunotherapy Response in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comparative Study of Large Language Models and Human Experts.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal cancers: Diagnostic, prognostic, and surgical strategies.Cancer letters · 2025Review
- AxiWorm: a new tool using YOLOv5 to test antiparasitic drugs against Trichinella spiralis.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence techniques in liver cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Research Progress in Predicting Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumour Thrombus in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-targeted agents for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is promising, individual response variability exists. Therefore, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model to predict treatment efficacy using pre-ICIs contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) imaging characteristics. We evaluated the efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in 43 patients at the Nagasaki University Hospital from 2020 to 2022 using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. A total of 197 Progressive Disease (PD), 271 Partial Response (PR), and 342 Stable Disease (SD) contrast CT images of HCC were used for training. We used ResNet-18 as the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model and YOLOv5, YOLOv7, YOLOv8 as the You Only Look Once (YOLO) model with precision-recall curves and class activation maps (CAMs) for diagnostic performance evaluation and model interpretation, respectively. The 3D t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding was used for image feature analysis. The YOLOv7 model demonstrated Precision 53.7%, Recall 100%, F1 score 69.8%, mAP@0.5 99.5% for PD, providing accurate and clinically versatile predictions by identifying decisive points. The ResNet-18 model had Precision 100% and Recall 100% for PD. However, the CAMs sites did not align with the tumors, suggesting the CNN model is not predicting that a given CT slice is PD, PR, or SD, but that it accurately predicts Individual Patient's CT slices. Preparing substantial training data for tumor drug effect prediction models is challenging compared to general tumor diagnosis models; hence, large-scale validation using an efficient YOLO model is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.