ArticleScientific reports2024
Relationship between prediction accuracy and uncertainty in compound potency prediction using deep neural networks and control models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty Quantification in Molecular Machine Learning for Property Predictions under Data Shifts.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Combining Bayesian and Evidential Uncertainty Quantification for Improved Bioactivity Modeling.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Consensus Modeling for Activity Ranking and Chemical Landscape Analysis of HIV-1 Inhibitors.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Achieving well-informed decision-making in drug discovery: a comprehensive calibration study using neural network-based structure-activity models.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The assessment of prediction variance or uncertainty contributes to the evaluation of machine learning models. In molecular machine learning, uncertainty quantification is an evolving area of research where currently no standard approaches or general guidelines are available. We have carried out a detailed analysis of deep neural network variants and simple control models for compound potency prediction to study relationships between prediction accuracy and uncertainty. For comparably accurate predictions obtained with models of different complexity, highly variable prediction uncertainties were detected using different metrics. Furthermore, a strong dependence of prediction characteristics and uncertainties on potency levels of test compounds was observed, often leading to over- or under-confident model decisions with respect to the expected variance of predictions. Moreover, neural network models responded very differently to training set modifications. Taken together, our findings indicate that there is only little, if any correlation between compound potency prediction accuracy and uncertainty, especially for deep neural network models, when predictions are assessed on the basis of currently used metrics for uncertainty quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.