Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38503818›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

STELA: a community-centred approach to norm elicitation for AI alignment.

Stevie Bergman, Nahema Marchal, John Mellor, Shakir Mohamed, Iason Gabriel, William Isaac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AI-Augmented Prevention Science Needs Community-Engaged Prevention Science: a Framework for Greater Accountability.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Applying a community-engaged participatory machine learning model.American journal of community psychology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stevie BergmanGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.
Nahema MarchalGoogle DeepMind, London, UK. nahemamarchal@google.com.
John MellorGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.
Shakir MohamedGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.
Iason GabrielGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.
William IsaacGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Value alignment, the process of ensuring that artificial intelligence (AI) systems are aligned with human values and goals, is a critical issue in AI research. Existing scholarship has mainly studied how to encode moral values into agents to guide their behaviour. Less attention has been given to the normative questions of whose values and norms AI systems should be aligned with, and how these choices should be made. To tackle these questions, this paper presents the STELA process (SocioTEchnical Language agent Alignment), a methodology resting on sociotechnical traditions of participatory, inclusive, and community-centred processes. For STELA, we conduct a series of deliberative discussions with four historically underrepresented groups in the United States in order to understand their diverse priorities and concerns when interacting with AI systems. The results of our research suggest that community-centred deliberation on the outputs of large language models is a valuable tool for eliciting latent normative perspectives directly from differently situated groups. In addition to having the potential to engender an inclusive process that is robust to the needs of communities, this methodology can provide rich contextual insights for AI alignment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLanguageHumansMoralsRest

Identifiers

PMID38503818
PMCPMC10951208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.