Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38503804›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Denoising OCT videos based on temporal redundancy.

Emmanuelle Richer, Marissé Masís Solano, Farida Cheriet, Mark R Lesk, Santiago Costantino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuelle RicherDepartment of Computer Engineering and Software Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada.
Marissé Masís SolanoMaisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada.
Farida CherietDepartment of Computer Engineering and Software Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada.
Mark R LeskMaisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada.
Santiago CostantinoMaisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada. santiago.costantino@umontreal.ca.
Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAPolytechnique Montréal · CA

Funding

Canadian Space Agency 19NASAHER3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of eye diseases and their progression often relies on a clear visualization of the anatomy and on different metrics extracted from Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) B-scans. However, speckle noise hinders the quality of rapid OCT imaging, hampering the extraction and reliability of biomarkers that require time series. By synchronizing the acquisition of OCT images with the timing of the cardiac pulse, we transform a low-quality OCT video into a clear version by phase-wrapping each frame to the heart pulsation and averaging frames that correspond to the same instant in the cardiac cycle. Here, we compare the performance of our one-cycle denoising strategy with a deep-learning architecture, Noise2Noise, as well as classical denoising methods such as BM3D and Non-Local Means (NLM). We systematically analyze different image quality descriptors as well as region-specific metrics to assess the denoising performance based on the anatomy of the eye. The one-cycle method achieves the highest denoising performance, increases image quality and preserves the high-resolution structures within the eye tissues. The proposed workflow can be readily implemented in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, Optical CoherenceReproducibility of ResultsSignal-To-Noise RatioTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID38503804
PMCPMC10951312
OpenAlexW4392947299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.