Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38503795›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Therapists and patients perceptions of a mixed reality system designed to improve trunk control and upper extremity function.

M Scheermesser, D Baumgartner, I Nast, J Bansi, J Kool, P Bischof, C M Bauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

M Scheermesser *School of Health Sciences, Institute of Physiotherapy, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 9, 8401, Winterthur, Switzerland. shem@zhaw.ch.
D Baumgartner *School of Engineering, Institute of Mechanical Systems IMES, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Technikumstrasse 71, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland.
I NastSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Physiotherapy, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 9, 8401, Winterthur, Switzerland.
J BansiKliniken-Valens, Research and Development, Rehabilitation Centre Valens, Taminaplatz 1, 7317, Valens, Switzerland.
J KoolKliniken-Valens, Research and Development, Rehabilitation Centre Valens, Taminaplatz 1, 7317, Valens, Switzerland.
P BischofSchool of Engineering, Institute of Mechanical Systems IMES, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Technikumstrasse 71, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland.
C M BauerSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Physiotherapy, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 9, 8401, Winterthur, Switzerland. christoph.bauer@llui.org.
Sulzer (Switzerland) · CHZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences · CHUniversity of Applied Sciences St. Gallen · CHUniversity of Jyväskylä · FIValens Clinics · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prototype system aimed at improving arm function and trunk control after stroke has been developed that combines mixed-reality (MR) feedback with a mobile seat system (Holoreach). The purpose of this study was to assess the usability of Holoreach in a rehabilitation setting from both the patient and therapist perspective. Ten therapists (eight physiotherapists and two occupational therapists) used the device in their regular therapy programs for fifteen stroke patients with trunk control issues. Each patient received four individual therapy sessions with the device performed under the supervision of the therapist. Therapists and patients kept therapy diaries and used customized questionnaires. At the end of the study two focus groups were conducted to further assess usability. Generally, the prototype system is suitable for training trunk and arm control. The therapists expressed overall positive views on the impact of Holoreach. They characterized it as new, motivating, fresh, joyful, interesting, and exciting. All therapists and 80% of the patients agreed with the statement that training with Holoreach is beneficial for rehabilitation. Nonetheless, improvements are required in the hardware and software, and design. The prototype system contributes at various levels to the rapidly evolving advances in neurorehabilitation, particularly regarding the practical aspect of exercise delivery.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityStrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansSoftwareUpper ExtremityAugmented realityMedical devices and technologiesRehabilitationStrokeTrunk control

Identifiers

PMID38503795
PMCPMC10951291
OpenAlexW4392948758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.