Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38503517›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2024

Protein domains of low sequence complexity-dark matter of the proteome.

Steven L McKnight

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Steven L McKnightDepartment of Biochemistry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9152, USA steven.mcknight@utsouthwestern.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This perspective begins with a speculative consideration of the properties of the earliest proteins to appear during evolution. What did these primitive proteins look like, and how were they of benefit to early forms of life? I proceed to hypothesize that primitive proteins have been preserved through evolution and now serve diverse functions important to the dynamics of cell morphology and biological regulation. The primitive nature of these modern proteins is easy to spot. They are composed of a limited subset of the 20 amino acids used by traditionally evolved proteins and thus are of low sequence complexity. This chemical simplicity limits protein domains of low sequence complexity to forming only a crude and labile type of protein structure currently hidden from the computational powers of machine learning. I conclude by hypothesizing that this structural weakness represents the underlying virtue of proteins that, at least for the moment, constitute the dark matter of the proteome.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsProteomeProtein DomainsAmino AcidsProteomeintrinsically disordered sequenceslow-complexity sequencesphase separation

Identifiers

PMID38503517
PMCPMC11065162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.