Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38503513›Full record

SynthesisPhytotherapy research : PTR2024

A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of turmeric in the treatment of digestive disorders.

Kednapa Thavorn, Dianna Wolfe, Lena Faust, Risa Shorr, Maya Akkawi, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai, Christopher Klinger, Chatree Chai-Adisaksopa, Pimwara Tanvejsilp, Surapon Nochaiwong and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Phytotherapy research : PTR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Turmeric (Pharmaceutical biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kednapa ThavornClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4738-8447
Dianna WolfeClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1807-6647
Lena FaustMcGill International Tuberculosis Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Risa ShorrClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Maya AkkawiClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Wanrudee IsaranuwatchaiHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Christopher KlingerDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Chatree Chai-AdisaksopaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pimwara TanvejsilpDepartment of Social Administrative Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Surapon NochaiwongPharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Sharon E StrausKnowledge Translation Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Brian HuttonClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field: Resource for ResearchR24AT001293 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BERMAN, BRIAN M, WIELAND, LISA SUSAN · 2003 to 2022
$9.4M
Li Ka Shing Post-doctoral Fellowship ProgramNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health of the National Institutes of Health R24AT001293NCCIH NIH HHS R24 AT001293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Turmeric has been gaining popularity as a treatment option for digestive disorders, although a rigorous synthesis of efficacy has not been conducted. This study aimed to summarize the evidence for the efficacy and safety of turmeric in the treatment of digestive disorders, including inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), dyspepsia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and peptic ulcers. Literature searches were conducted in Medline, EMBASE, AMED, the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials, and Dissertation Abstracts from inception to November 15, 2021. Dual independent screening of citations and full texts was conducted and studies meeting inclusion criteria were retained: randomized controlled trials (RCT) and comparative observational studies evaluating turmeric use in people of any age with one of the digestive disorders of interest. Extraction of relevant data and risk of bias assessments were performed by two reviewers independently. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to high heterogeneity. From 1136 citations screened, 26 eligible studies were retained. Most studies were assessed to have a high risk of bias, and many had methodological limitations. Descriptive summaries suggest that turmeric is safe, with possible efficacy in patients with IBD or IBS, but its effects were inconsistent for other conditions. The efficacy of turmeric in digestive disorders remains unclear due to the high risk of bias and methodological limitations of the included studies. Future studies should be designed to include larger sample sizes, use rigorous statistical methods, employ core outcome sets, and adhere to reporting guidance for RCTs of herbal interventions to facilitate more meaningful comparisons and robust conclusions.

Indexed as

CurcumaDigestive System DiseasesHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesIrritable Bowel SyndromePlant ExtractsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicPlant Extractsturmeric extractcurcumindigestive disordersefficacysafetysystematic reviewturmeric

Identifiers

PMID38503513
PMCPMC11168884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.