Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38503505›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2024

Negative Coupling: The Coincidence of Premating Isolating Barriers Can Reduce Reproductive Isolation.

Thomas G Aubier, Michael Kopp, Isaac J Linn, Oscar Puebla, Marina Rafajlović, Maria R Servedio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Coupling of Barriers to Gene Exchange: Causes and Consequences.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  2. Genetic Coupling of Mate Recognition Systems in the Genomic Era.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  3. How Important Is Sexual Isolation to Speciation?Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Structural Variants and Speciation: Multiple Processes at Play.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas G AubierCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse INP, Université Toulouse 3 - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Toulouse, France thomas.aubier@normalesup.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8543-5596
Michael KoppAix Marseille Université, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, I2M, UMR 7373, 13331 Marseille Cedex 3, France.
Isaac J LinnDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
Oscar PueblaLeibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Marina RafajlovićDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2177-4622
Maria R ServedioDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speciation can be mediated by a variety of reproductive barriers, and the interaction among different barriers has often been shown to enhance overall reproductive isolation, a process referred to as "coupling." Here, we analyze a population genetics model to study the establishment of linkage disequilibrium (LD) among loci involved in multiple premating barriers, an aspect that has received little theoretical attention to date. We consider a simple genetic framework underlying two distinct premating barriers, each encoded by a preference locus and its associated mating trait locus. We show that their interaction can lead to a decrease in overall reproductive isolation relative to a situation with a single barrier, a process we call "negative coupling." More specifically, in our model, negative coupling results either from sexual selection that reduces divergence at all loci, or from reduced LD that occurs because the presence of many females with "mismatched" preferences causes the mating success of recombinant males to become high. Interestingly, the latter effect may even cause LD among preference loci to become negative when recombination rates among loci are low. We conclude that coincident reproductive barriers may not necessarily reinforce each other, and that the underlying loci may not necessarily develop a positive association.

Indexed as

Linkage DisequilibriumReproductive IsolationAnimalsFemaleGenetic SpeciationGenetics, PopulationMaleModels, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID38503505
PMCPMC11444250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.